• Scott Arendt (3/16/2011)


    ronmoses (3/16/2011)


    paul s-306273 (3/16/2011)


    I don't really see the value of this question...

    The nearly 40% of respondents who got it wrong learned something today. That alone seems valuable enough to me, especially since that's the entire point of QotD.

    Just because something is learned, does not necessarily mean that it has value. It only has value if it is useful. I would say that this is more interesting than useful.

    It's valuable if you learn what not to do or what might cause a problem. It's not always what is positively learned. sometimes it's what is negative that you should avoid.