• Koen Verbeeck (3/4/2011)


    wagner crivelini (3/4/2011)


    Men, I didn't know how common those "reprints" were!!

    I checked Google and found 3 of my articles shown in some "serious" blogs out there. And 1 one of them has the nerve to write :

    "To read more: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/......"

    The only extra information people can find in SQLServerCentral's link is my name 😀

    The reference to sqlservercentral is so that they can say they were just "quoting" you.

    It's still copyright infringement (if they attributed Wagner) or outright plagiarism (if they didn't attribute Wagner). The only way it's not CI is if they asked Wagner's permission first or if he blatantly gave permission to anyone to use it.

    I couldn't help myself. I posted a comment on Alok's blog:

    Wow. This article is an exact duplicate (except for the first line) of an article posted yesterday on SQLServerCentral.com, by a different author. And since the SSC author had to wait a few weeks to get his article approved, it leads one to the conclusion that this blog post is possibly plagiarized.

    Care to explain?

    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/model/72275/

    Brandie Tarvin, MCITP Database AdministratorLiveJournal Blog: http://brandietarvin.livejournal.com/[/url]On LinkedIn!, Google+, and Twitter.Freelance Writer: ShadowrunLatchkeys: Nevermore, Latchkeys: The Bootleg War, and Latchkeys: Roscoes in the Night are now available on Nook and Kindle.