• KermitTheRock (2/28/2011)


    Actually, I wrote of this just a week ago. The Contains function is often not sufficient for end user search. It doesn't handle misspellings, suggested search, implied "AND", and crashes on use of a noise word.

    FTS is not simply an inverted index of words, but is dependent on the query pipelining that happens before the index is accessed.

    Hmmm...well I've worked some time on getting it to work reasonably well for a somewhat specialized database with lots of weird product names like "M&Ms". Not sure I understood what the consensus was on the previous thread, that "only google has the resources to do it", or "we only will do it when we're paid to do it"?