Christian Buettner (5/8/2008)
And the provided link should be evidence enough.
To take the first bit of evidence presented and then dismiss all other evidence that disagrees is a bit one-eyed. If I had submitted the Q and excluded Resource as system database with the evidence of my BOL link, would that link then be "evidence enough" to say that it isn't one?
The provided link is prima facie
evidence, but conflicting evidence is now being presented.
The discussion seems to centring around "what makes a system database, and what name would it called by?"
The BOL has contradictory statements in it (surprise!). I have provided BOL and empirical evidence that it fails to be a system database. Others also have submitted info both for and against the Q's stance. Weigh up the evidence, yes; argue against it even. But please, don't dismiss it just because it disagrees with someone's viewpoint; you have to have a better reason than that.