Storage Size

Question

Post reply

Storage Size

alok-500895

SSC Rookie

Points: 37
More actions
April 8, 2008 at 8:49 pm

#379702

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Storage Size

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 57 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Vivien Xing SSChampion Points: 12297 More actions · Answer 1

Name + profession can take max 154?

[Name] NVARCHAR(50) --> 50 X 2 + 2 = 102

Ref BOL: "nchar and nvarchar (Transact-SQL)"

The storage size, in bytes, is two times the number of characters entered + 2 bytes.

sp_help tbPersonalDetails shows total 316 bytes in length.

Anders Pedersen SSChampion Points: 11410 More actions · Answer 2

Without couting them all up.... there are 150 Nvarchars, so the answer has to be somewhere above 300 bytes....

Manish_ Ten Centuries Points: 1070 More actions · Answer 3

CoulumnNameTypeLength

---------------------------------------

PK_ID int 4

Name nvarchar 100

Married bit 1

DOB smalldatetime 4

BachelorsDegreebit 1

MastersDegreebit 1

Profession nvarchar 200

Retired bit 1

Age int 4

---------------------------------------

316

---------------------------------------

- Manish

gbn SSCertifiable Points: 6429 More actions · Answer 4

Age is not persisted, so it is 312.

But there is the "+2" per variable length column.

So 316... but for the wrong reasons

MarkusB SSC-Dedicated Points: 37370 More actions · Answer 5

What's going on with these questions.

Again one with no correct answer to choose from.

I know Steve Jones explained the process of choosing and testing QOTD in his article yesterday and I really don't wanna blame him.

But come on this one today is so obviously wrong, I didn't even bother to pick an answer.

[font="Verdana"]Markus Bohse[/font]

Yogeesh SSC-Addicted Points: 489 More actions · Answer 6

I am not seeing the source from where this answer is taken. New way of computations!

skra SSCommitted Points: 1614 More actions · Answer 7

By the way, all bit fields are kept in one byte.

BOL:

"Microsoft® SQL Server™ optimizes the storage used for bit columns. If there are 8 or fewer bit columns in a table, the columns are stored as 1 byte. If there are from 9 through 16 bit columns, they are stored as 2 bytes, and so on."

Mighty SSCrazy Eights Points: 9063 More actions · Answer 8

Randomly choose an answer since all were wrong (25% chance I would choose the "right" one).

Based on BOL "Estimate the size of a heap" (Row_Size = Fixed_Data_Size + Variable_Data_Size + Null_Bitmap + 4 = 17 + 306 + 4 + 4) the answer should be 331, but I'm most likely also making a calculation mistake 😉

Hugo Kornelis SSC Guru Points: 64780 More actions · Answer 9

Hi all,

I think this is a great question, though thwarted by an incorrect answer, unfortunately.

The question is great because hardly anyone knows exactly how this works. That is shown by the fact that of the "correct" answers posted thus far in this thread, none is actually correct. (And boy, do I expose myself to ridicule now should my answer prove to be wrong as well :D)

But the incorrect answer options result in this QotD being more of a missed opportunity than a learning experience. Sadly.

So, here are the things that are wrong in either the answer provided as "correct", or in the replies I have seen so far.

* NVarchar takes two bytes per character. The QotD misses this, the replies here don't.

* Up to 8 BIT columns are combined in a single bytes. Calculated correctly by QotD, missed by all forum replies.

* Calulcated columns are not stored, unless marked as PERSISTED or included in an index (and in the latter case, they are stored only in the index). Calculated correctly by QotD, missed by most forum replies.

* All varying length columns have a two byte overhead. Missed by the QotD and some of the replies here

* Another two bytes overhead per row are added if a table has at least one varying length column. Missed by all.

* The row also stores a NULL bitmap, one byte for the first 8 columns, one for the next 8, etc. I think that calculated columns don't count (but couldn't find conmfirmation), so that would be 1 byte for the 8 "normal" columns. Missed by all.

* Each row has 4 bytes row header overhead; again missed by all.

* And finally, 2 bytes per row are needed for the row's entry in the slot array, though Books Online does not include this in the calculation for Row_Size.

So we have a maximum data size of 300 bytes for the two nvarchar columns, 4 for the integer, 4 for the smalldatetime, 1 for the 4 bits, and 0 for the (incorrectly) calculated age - max. 309 data size.

We also have some in-row overhead: null bitmap (1), varying length columns (2 because they exist, plus 2 for each varying length column - adding up to 6), and row header overhead (4) - a total of 11 bytes for in-row overhead.

According to the definition of Row_Size in Books Online, that would make for 309 + 11 = 320 bytes per row.

For the real storage requirement per row, we should also include the 2 bytes for the row slot array, so this table will realy take a maximum of 322 bytes of storage per row.

Ref: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178085.aspx

Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server/Data Platform MVP (2006-2016)
Visit my SQL Server blog: https://sqlserverfast.com/blog/
SQL Server Execution Plan Reference: https://sqlserverfast.com/epr/

majorbloodnock SSCrazy Eights Points: 9389 More actions · Answer 10

I agree with Hugo; I thought this was a good question.

Being before my second morning cuppa, I misread nvarchar, so neglected to factor unicode into my calculations, and so got the question "right". However, I most certainly didn't think about the other "overhead" costs, and so I've learnt something new. Is it an important something? Probably not, given the fact that my table size estimates are based on far more approximate figures anyway (Microsoft don't have a 10% "For Luck" overhead included in their calculations ;)), but it's added to my understanding which I don't think can ever be a waste.

So thank you, Alok, for a good question, and commiserations that your answer choices were off the mark.

And a reminder to everyone having a moan that Steve did pose the far bigger challenge (if you're up for it) that you can submit QOTDs of your own. Basically, if you think you can do better, prove it.

Semper in excretia, suus solum profundum variat

Evgeny G. Shymshyt Old Hand Points: 313 More actions · Answer 11

So, correct variant of question is:

What is the maximum data size of a row in the following table
(without additional overhead expenses bytes and for NVARCHAR type calculating only symbols, not bytes)
CREATE TABLE tbPersonalDetails(
PK_ID INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
[Name] NVARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
Married BIT NOT NULL,
DOB SMALLDATETIME NOT NULL,
BachelorsDegree BIT NOT NULL,
MastersDegree BIT NOT NULL,
Profession NVARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
Retired BIT NOT NULL,
Age AS (DATEDIFF(yy,DOB,GETDATE()))
)
GO

Maarten Takens SSC Eights! Points: 824 More actions · Answer 12

I would have suggested 316 bytes max storageper row but i have read in this Forum ( special thanks to Hugo Kornelis ) that this should be 322 bytes per row ..

although it is a pity that the QOD does not provide the correct answers to this question the discussion in this Forum is great and you really can learn from it! ..

See yaa

Maarten

shamas saeed SSC-Addicted Points: 458 More actions · Answer 13

Check ur Question Complete Context before post because this will missguid many peoples who do not know detail

In Your Qustion nvarchar used double bytes as length define and Computed column also use int datatype storage bytes for check create the mentioned table and use Alt+F1 to see its help

Bill Mell SSCommitted Points: 1621 More actions · Answer 14

I got it right only because I pretended that an nvarchar(50) only takes 50 bytes instead of the 100 it actually takes and that an nvarchar(100) only takes 100 bytes instead of the 200 that it actually takes.

You would think that you would have had the correct answer in there at least once.