Select.. where column1 in (@var)

  • What am I missing?

    Why would this work

    SELECT *

    FROM #MainQuery

    WHERE column1 IN ('Value1','Value2')

    and this not?

    declare @Var varchar(100)

    set @TOB = '''Value1'',''Value2'''

    SELECT *

    FROM #MainQuery

    WHERE column1 IN (@Var)

  • Raul Undreiner (2/27/2013)


    What am I missing?

    Why would this work

    SELECT *

    FROM #MainQuery

    WHERE column1 IN ('Value1','Value2')

    and this not?

    declare @Var varchar(100)

    set @TOB = '''Value1'',''Value2'''

    SELECT *

    FROM #MainQuery

    WHERE column1 IN (@Var)

    This:

    declare @Var varchar(100)

    set @TOB = 'Value1,Value2';

    SELECT

    *

    FROM

    #MainQuery

    WHERE

    column1 in (select Item from dbo.DelimitedSplit8K(@Var,','));

    Split routine used above, be sure to read all the comments carefully:

    /****** Object: UserDefinedFunction [dbo].[DelimitedSplit8K] Script Date: 02/27/2013 08:36:30 ******/

    IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[DelimitedSplit8K]') AND type in (N'FN', N'IF', N'TF', N'FS', N'FT'))

    DROP FUNCTION [dbo].[DelimitedSplit8K]

    GO

    /****** Object: UserDefinedFunction [dbo].[DelimitedSplit8K] Script Date: 02/27/2013 08:36:30 ******/

    SET ANSI_NULLS ON

    GO

    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON

    GO

    CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[DelimitedSplit8K]

    /**********************************************************************************************************************

    Purpose:

    Split a given string at a given delimiter and return a list of the split elements (items).

    Notes:

    1. Leading a trailing delimiters are treated as if an empty string element were present.

    2. Consecutive delimiters are treated as if an empty string element were present between them.

    3. Except when spaces are used as a delimiter, all spaces present in each element are preserved.

    Returns:

    iTVF containing the following:

    ItemNumber = Element position of Item as a BIGINT (not converted to INT to eliminate a CAST)

    Item = Element value as a VARCHAR(8000)

    Statistics on this function may be found at the following URL:

    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1101315-203-4.aspx

    CROSS APPLY Usage Examples and Tests:

    --=====================================================================================================================

    -- TEST 1:

    -- This tests for various possible conditions in a string using a comma as the delimiter. The expected results are

    -- laid out in the comments

    --=====================================================================================================================

    --===== Conditionally drop the test tables to make reruns easier for testing.

    -- (this is NOT a part of the solution)

    IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#JBMTest') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #JBMTest

    ;

    --===== Create and populate a test table on the fly (this is NOT a part of the solution).

    -- In the following comments, "b" is a blank and "E" is an element in the left to right order.

    -- Double Quotes are used to encapsulate the output of "Item" so that you can see that all blanks

    -- are preserved no matter where they may appear.

    SELECT *

    INTO #JBMTest

    FROM ( --# & type of Return Row(s)

    SELECT 0, NULL UNION ALL --1 NULL

    SELECT 1, SPACE(0) UNION ALL --1 b (Empty String)

    SELECT 2, SPACE(1) UNION ALL --1 b (1 space)

    SELECT 3, SPACE(5) UNION ALL --1 b (5 spaces)

    SELECT 4, ',' UNION ALL --2 b b (both are empty strings)

    SELECT 5, '55555' UNION ALL --1 E

    SELECT 6, ',55555' UNION ALL --2 b E

    SELECT 7, ',55555,' UNION ALL --3 b E b

    SELECT 8, '55555,' UNION ALL --2 b B

    SELECT 9, '55555,1' UNION ALL --2 E E

    SELECT 10, '1,55555' UNION ALL --2 E E

    SELECT 11, '55555,4444,333,22,1' UNION ALL --5 E E E E E

    SELECT 12, '55555,4444,,333,22,1' UNION ALL --6 E E b E E E

    SELECT 13, ',55555,4444,,333,22,1,' UNION ALL --8 b E E b E E E b

    SELECT 14, ',55555,4444,,,333,22,1,' UNION ALL --9 b E E b b E E E b

    SELECT 15, ' 4444,55555 ' UNION ALL --2 E (w/Leading Space) E (w/Trailing Space)

    SELECT 16, 'This,is,a,test.' --E E E E

    ) d (SomeID, SomeValue)

    ;

    --===== Split the CSV column for the whole table using CROSS APPLY (this is the solution)

    SELECT test.SomeID, test.SomeValue, split.ItemNumber, Item = QUOTENAME(split.Item,'"')

    FROM #JBMTest test

    CROSS APPLY dbo.DelimitedSplit8K(test.SomeValue,',') split

    ;

    --=====================================================================================================================

    -- TEST 2:

    -- This tests for various "alpha" splits and COLLATION using all ASCII characters from 0 to 255 as a delimiter against

    -- a given string. Note that not all of the delimiters will be visible and some will show up as tiny squares because

    -- they are "control" characters. More specifically, this test will show you what happens to various non-accented

    -- letters for your given collation depending on the delimiter you chose.

    --=====================================================================================================================

    WITH

    cteBuildAllCharacters (String,Delimiter) AS

    (

    SELECT TOP 256

    'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789',

    CHAR(ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL))-1)

    FROM master.sys.all_columns

    )

    SELECT ASCII_Value = ASCII(c.Delimiter), c.Delimiter, split.ItemNumber, Item = QUOTENAME(split.Item,'"')

    FROM cteBuildAllCharacters c

    CROSS APPLY dbo.DelimitedSplit8K(c.String,c.Delimiter) split

    ORDER BY ASCII_Value, split.ItemNumber

    ;

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Other Notes:

    1. Optimized for VARCHAR(8000) or less. No testing or error reporting for truncation at 8000 characters is done.

    2. Optimized for single character delimiter. Multi-character delimiters should be resolvedexternally from this

    function.

    3. Optimized for use with CROSS APPLY.

    4. Does not "trim" elements just in case leading or trailing blanks are intended.

    5. If you don't know how a Tally table can be used to replace loops, please see the following...

    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/62867/

    6. Changing this function to use NVARCHAR(MAX) will cause it to run twice as slow. It's just the nature of

    VARCHAR(MAX) whether it fits in-row or not.

    7. Multi-machine testing for the method of using UNPIVOT instead of 10 SELECT/UNION ALLs shows that the UNPIVOT method

    is quite machine dependent and can slow things down quite a bit.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Credits:

    This code is the product of many people's efforts including but not limited to the following:

    cteTally concept originally by Iztek Ben Gan and "decimalized" by Lynn Pettis (and others) for a bit of extra speed

    and finally redacted by Jeff Moden for a different slant on readability and compactness. Hat's off to Paul White for

    his simple explanations of CROSS APPLY and for his detailed testing efforts. Last but not least, thanks to

    Ron "BitBucket" McCullough and Wayne Sheffield for their extreme performance testing across multiple machines and

    versions of SQL Server. The latest improvement brought an additional 15-20% improvement over Rev 05. Special thanks

    to "Nadrek" and "peter-757102" (aka Peter de Heer) for bringing such improvements to light. Nadrek's original

    improvement brought about a 10% performance gain and Peter followed that up with the content of Rev 07.

    I also thank whoever wrote the first article I ever saw on "numbers tables" which is located at the following URL

    and to Adam Machanic for leading me to it many years ago.

    http://sqlserver2000.databases.aspfaq.com/why-should-i-consider-using-an-auxiliary-numbers-table.html

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Revision History:

    Rev 00 - 20 Jan 2010 - Concept for inline cteTally: Lynn Pettis and others.

    Redaction/Implementation: Jeff Moden

    - Base 10 redaction and reduction for CTE. (Total rewrite)

    Rev 01 - 13 Mar 2010 - Jeff Moden

    - Removed one additional concatenation and one subtraction from the SUBSTRING in the SELECT List for that tiny

    bit of extra speed.

    Rev 02 - 14 Apr 2010 - Jeff Moden

    - No code changes. Added CROSS APPLY usage example to the header, some additional credits, and extra

    documentation.

    Rev 03 - 18 Apr 2010 - Jeff Moden

    - No code changes. Added notes 7, 8, and 9 about certain "optimizations" that don't actually work for this

    type of function.

    Rev 04 - 29 Jun 2010 - Jeff Moden

    - Added WITH SCHEMABINDING thanks to a note by Paul White. This prevents an unnecessary "Table Spool" when the

    function is used in an UPDATE statement even though the function makes no external references.

    Rev 05 - 02 Apr 2011 - Jeff Moden

    - Rewritten for extreme performance improvement especially for larger strings approaching the 8K boundary and

    for strings that have wider elements. The redaction of this code involved removing ALL concatenation of

    delimiters, optimization of the maximum "N" value by using TOP instead of including it in the WHERE clause,

    and the reduction of all previous calculations (thanks to the switch to a "zero based" cteTally) to just one

    instance of one add and one instance of a subtract. The length calculation for the final element (not

    followed by a delimiter) in the string to be split has been greatly simplified by using the ISNULL/NULLIF

    combination to determine when the CHARINDEX returned a 0 which indicates there are no more delimiters to be

    had or to start with. Depending on the width of the elements, this code is between 4 and 8 times faster on a

    single CPU box than the original code especially near the 8K boundary.

    - Modified comments to include more sanity checks on the usage example, etc.

    - Removed "other" notes 8 and 9 as they were no longer applicable.

    Rev 06 - 12 Apr 2011 - Jeff Moden

    - Based on a suggestion by Ron "Bitbucket" McCullough, additional test rows were added to the sample code and

    the code was changed to encapsulate the output in pipes so that spaces and empty strings could be perceived

    in the output. The first "Notes" section was added. Finally, an extra test was added to the comments above.

    Rev 07 - 06 May 2011 - Peter de Heer, a further 15-20% performance enhancement has been discovered and incorporated

    into this code which also eliminated the need for a "zero" position in the cteTally table.

    **********************************************************************************************************************/

    --===== Define I/O parameters

    (@pString VARCHAR(8000), @pDelimiter CHAR(1))

    RETURNS TABLE WITH SCHEMABINDING AS

    RETURN

    --===== "Inline" CTE Driven "Tally Table" produces values from 0 up to 10,000...

    -- enough to cover NVARCHAR(4000)

    WITH E1(N) AS (

    SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL

    SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL

    SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1

    ), --10E+1 or 10 rows

    E2(N) AS (SELECT 1 FROM E1 a, E1 b), --10E+2 or 100 rows

    E4(N) AS (SELECT 1 FROM E2 a, E2 b), --10E+4 or 10,000 rows max

    cteTally(N) AS (--==== This provides the "base" CTE and limits the number of rows right up front

    -- for both a performance gain and prevention of accidental "overruns"

    SELECT TOP (ISNULL(DATALENGTH(@pString),0)) ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) FROM E4

    ),

    cteStart(N1) AS (--==== This returns N+1 (starting position of each "element" just once for each delimiter)

    SELECT 1 UNION ALL

    SELECT t.N+1 FROM cteTally t WHERE SUBSTRING(@pString,t.N,1) = @pDelimiter

    ),

    cteLen(N1,L1) AS(--==== Return start and length (for use in substring)

    SELECT s.N1,

    ISNULL(NULLIF(CHARINDEX(@pDelimiter,@pString,s.N1),0)-s.N1,8000)

    FROM cteStart s

    )

    --===== Do the actual split. The ISNULL/NULLIF combo handles the length for the final element when no delimiter is found.

    SELECT ItemNumber = ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY l.N1),

    Item = SUBSTRING(@pString, l.N1, l.L1)

    FROM cteLen l;

    GO

  • SQL is a declarative language, so a delimited list stored in a variable won't be evaluated. In short, I believe there are two ways of accomplishing this.

    The first approach uses dynamic SQL. Build you SQL statement and then execute it. Here's an example:

    declare @Var varchar(100),

    @strSQL NVarchar(500);

    set @Var = '''Value1'', ''Value2''';

    SET @strSQL = 'SELECT * ' +

    'FROM MainQuery ' +

    'WHERE column1 IN (' + @Var + ');';

    EXECUTE sp_executesql @strSQL;

    In the other appoach you would create a temp table (let's call it #temp) and populate it with the values you want to check for. Then use normal SQL and query them using an EXISTS against the temp table. here's an example:

    SELECT *

    FROM MainQuery

    WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1

    FROM #temp

    WHERE #temp.Value = MainQuery.Column1);

    Hope one of these ways works for you.

  • I like Lynn's approach of splitting it inline and keeping it to a single query instead of using temp tables. Also, his function will be usable elsewhere.

  • Thanks Lynn and Ed for your prompt replies. I agree, Lynn's approach is reusable but for temp queries I might use Ed's

    Thanks again

  • Raul Undreiner (2/27/2013)


    What am I missing?

    Why would this work

    SELECT *

    FROM #MainQuery

    WHERE column1 IN ('Value1','Value2')

    and this not?

    declare @Var varchar(100)

    set @TOB = '''Value1'',''Value2'''

    SELECT *

    FROM #MainQuery

    WHERE column1 IN (@Var)

    -- because this

    declare @Var varchar(100)

    set @TOB = '''Value1'',''Value2'''

    SELECT *

    FROM #MainQuery

    WHERE column1 IN (@Var)

    -- is the same as this

    SELECT *

    FROM #MainQuery

    WHERE column1 IN ('Value1,Value2')

    -- which has only one value in the list

    -- and may not have a match in column1

    “Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw

    For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
    Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
    Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden

  • Raul Undreiner (2/27/2013)


    Thanks Lynn and Ed for your prompt replies. I agree, Lynn's approach is reusable but for temp queries I might use Ed's

    Thanks again

    Be careful here. Ed's approach is vulnerable to sql injection.

    declare @Var varchar(100),

    @strSQL NVarchar(500);

    set @Var = '''1'', ''2'');select top 10 * from sys.tables--';

    SET @strSQL = 'SELECT * ' +

    'FROM sys.objects ' +

    'WHERE object_id IN (' + @Var + ');';

    EXECUTE sp_executesql @strSQL;

    I would recommend Lynn's approach. His is much easier to use AND it is not using dynamic sql that is vulnerable to injection.

    _______________________________________________________________

    Need help? Help us help you.

    Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.

    Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.

    Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
    Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
    Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
    Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/

  • Ed Wagner (2/27/2013)


    I like Lynne's approach of splitting it inline and keeping it to a single query instead of using temp tables. Also, her function will be usable elsewhere.

    Two minor comments. One, my name doesn't end in an "e". Two, I am a guy, not a gal.

  • Good point. After the function is set up initially, it's also more straightforward to use.

  • Lynn Pettis (2/27/2013)


    Ed Wagner (2/27/2013)


    I like Lynne's approach of splitting it inline and keeping it to a single query instead of using temp tables. Also, her function will be usable elsewhere.

    Two minor comments. One, my name doesn't end in an "e". Two, I am a guy, not a gal.

    Lynn: I apologize. I won't make the same mistake again. Thank you for correcting me.

  • Didn't Todd Fifield just write an article on this?

    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/73838/


    My mantra: No loops! No CURSORs! No RBAR! Hoo-uh![/I]

    My thought question: Have you ever been told that your query runs too fast?

    My advice:
    INDEXing a poor-performing query is like putting sugar on cat food. Yeah, it probably tastes better but are you sure you want to eat it?
    The path of least resistance can be a slippery slope. Take care that fixing your fixes of fixes doesn't snowball and end up costing you more than fixing the root cause would have in the first place.

    Need to UNPIVOT? Why not CROSS APPLY VALUES instead?[/url]
    Since random numbers are too important to be left to chance, let's generate some![/url]
    Learn to understand recursive CTEs by example.[/url]
    [url url=http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/St

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply