Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


DateTime Precision


DateTime Precision

Author
Message
jkelly
jkelly
Old Hand
Old Hand (341 reputation)Old Hand (341 reputation)Old Hand (341 reputation)Old Hand (341 reputation)Old Hand (341 reputation)Old Hand (341 reputation)Old Hand (341 reputation)Old Hand (341 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 341 Visits: 207
Comments posted to this topic are about the item DateTime Precision



bitbucket-25253
bitbucket-25253
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 6387 Visits: 25280
As Sherlock Holmes said to Dr. Watson ................ Very interesting

If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.

Ron

Please help us, help you -before posting a question please read

Before posting a performance problem please read
M&M
M&M
SSCrazy
SSCrazy (3K reputation)SSCrazy (3K reputation)SSCrazy (3K reputation)SSCrazy (3K reputation)SSCrazy (3K reputation)SSCrazy (3K reputation)SSCrazy (3K reputation)SSCrazy (3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2959 Visits: 3900
Good observation. Thanks.

M&M
cengland0
cengland0
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1538 Visits: 1300
Don't you hate it when the explanation says, "Despite what BOL says..."

It should either be mentioned in BOL or do what the BOL says.
bitbucket-25253
bitbucket-25253
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)SSCertifiable (6.4K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 6387 Visits: 25280
cengland0 (11/27/2011)
Don't you hate it when the explanation says, "Despite what BOL says..."

It should either be mentioned in BOL or do what the BOL says.


Heck no one is perfect, and if memory serves me correctly those who write the explanations for BOL are NOT the developers or actual personnel writing the code ...

If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.

Ron

Please help us, help you -before posting a question please read

Before posting a performance problem please read
Jostein Saethern
Jostein Saethern
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.7K reputation)SSCommitted (1.7K reputation)SSCommitted (1.7K reputation)SSCommitted (1.7K reputation)SSCommitted (1.7K reputation)SSCommitted (1.7K reputation)SSCommitted (1.7K reputation)SSCommitted (1.7K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1699 Visits: 319
The question is not really about datetime precision, but string comparison.

If the comparison value had been declared as datetime, then the other values would be implicitly converted to datetime as well and the statement would return Yes.

declare @d as datetime
set @d = '2011-07-31 00:00:00.000'
IF @d BETWEEN '2011-07-01' and '2011-07-31'
PRINT 'Yes'
ELSE
PRINT 'No'


The question as it stands could just as well have been this

if ('abcd' between 'ab' and 'abc')
print 'yes'
else
print 'no'
vk-kirov
vk-kirov
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame (3.5K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.5K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.5K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.5K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.5K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.5K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.5K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.5K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 3546 Visits: 4408
Nice tricky question with stupid 'explanation'.
Of course, the string (not datetime) '2011-07-31 00:00:00.000' is greater than the other string '2011-07-31', and thus the result of the batch is 'No'.
Stephen E. Cook
Stephen E. Cook
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (869 reputation)SSC Eights! (869 reputation)SSC Eights! (869 reputation)SSC Eights! (869 reputation)SSC Eights! (869 reputation)SSC Eights! (869 reputation)SSC Eights! (869 reputation)SSC Eights! (869 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 869 Visits: 818
Glad I checked out the comments after getting this one wrong. I hate learning things that aren't true. :-)

-- Stephen Cook
Koen Verbeeck
Koen Verbeeck
SSCoach
SSCoach (19K reputation)SSCoach (19K reputation)SSCoach (19K reputation)SSCoach (19K reputation)SSCoach (19K reputation)SSCoach (19K reputation)SSCoach (19K reputation)SSCoach (19K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 19839 Visits: 13251
Silly trick question...


How to post forum questions.
Need an answer? No, you need a question.
What’s the deal with Excel & SSIS?
My blog at SQLKover.

MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
hakan.winther
hakan.winther
SSCrazy
SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2752 Visits: 605
Jostein Saethern (11/27/2011)
The question is not really about datetime precision, but string comparison.

If the comparison value had been declared as datetime, then the other values would be implicitly converted to datetime as well and the statement would return Yes.

declare @d as datetime
set @d = '2011-07-31 00:00:00.000'
IF @d BETWEEN '2011-07-01' and '2011-07-31'
PRINT 'Yes'
ELSE
PRINT 'No'


The question as it stands could just as well have been this

if ('abcd' between 'ab' and 'abc')
print 'yes'
else
print 'no'


You are right, I'ts very obvious when you think about it, but when you see something that looks like a date, you assume that SQL server see it as a date. BUT it would be dangerous if SQL server would interpret the datatypes based on the values, and this is just another reason to dislike the implicit conversions. (I know, there is no implicit conversion in the question, but we have learned to live with them so long that we assume it takes place all the time).

I really would like a database setting, a trace flag or something that warn you or prevent you from using implicit conversion and force you to use explicit conversion. Because if you do, you know that you are doing something wrong (from a performance perspective).

The explanation is not correct and should be changed.

/Håkan Winther
MCITPBigGrinatabase Developer 2008
MCTS: SQL Server 2008, Implementation and Maintenance
MCSE: Data Platform
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search