SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in

User Group Leaders: Who Are Your Members?

crowdAt the MVP Summit last week, I was talking with fellow Dallas-area tweep Sean McCown about our local SQL Server user group membership.  I think our group is unique because of its sheer size; we typically have between 70 and 90 people at our monthly meetings, with a mailing list that goes out to between 600 and 800 people.  So the question came up, whom should we consider as members?  Should members include anyone on our list, or only the regular attendees?

Technical communities, by nature, have fuzzy edges.  People migrate in and out of them all the time, with a very small core constituency and much larger group of folks with varying degrees of participation at any given time.  There’s nothing wrong with that; people participate as they have time, opportunity, and desire to do so, and those things can vary greatly in a person’s life.  The transient nature of these groups tends to be even more profound with larger groups, since it’s easier for individuals to slip in and out with relative anonymity.  To further complicate things, the intertoobz make it very easy for individuals to participate online with user communities worldwide.  I’m a perfect example of this; I am a “member” of two dozen or so local SQL Server user groups from coast to coast, and I participate in their mailing lists even though I’ve never physically attended their meetings.  So as you can tell, the question of who is and is not a member of a given user group can be difficult to answer.

Why Does It Matter?

For some groups, it doesn’t.  In smaller, less-formal user groups, there is very little overhead, and the question of group membership is rather trivial.  But in larger or more active groups, the issue of whom to include as an official group member can be more than just an academic metric.  Larger groups frequently have officers or board members to elect, money to collect and manage, events to run, rules to enforce, and perhaps even legal matters to handle.  To oversee all of that, there must be a clear way to identify which members of the community have a vote or are eligible for certain positions or responsibilities.

How Is It Done?

I’m sure it’s a little different for each group, but for the Dallas SQL Server user group we take a very open approach.  We consider anyone who is part of our mailing list to be a group member, with full voting rights.  We don’t have issues that require voting very often (normally just the yearly board elections) and have found this approach to be the most effective for us.  Further, we don’t arbitrarily restrict who may run for our local board, as the size of our group tends to make this a self-governing process – it’s highly unlikely that someone could walk in and get elected to the board without first having demonstrated some leadership of and loyalty to the group.

How Do YOU Do It?

So now that I’ve shared how we handle our SQL Server user group membership, I’d like to hear from other user group leaders to find out what others are doing.  Do you simply use your open mailing list, or do you have a more formal identification process?  Do you charge an arbitrary membership fee to see apart the members from everybody else?  Any pitfalls or successes you’d care to share in the approach you use?  Feel free to ping me offline if you’d rather share these details privately.

Tim Mitchell

Tim Mitchell is a business intelligence consultant, author, trainer, and Microsoft Data Platform MVP with over thirteen years of data management experience. He is the founder and principal of Tyleris Data Solutions.

Tim has spoken at international and local events including the SQL PASS Summit, SQLBits, SQL Connections, along with dozens of tech fests, code camps, and SQL Saturday events. He is coauthor of the book SSIS Design Patterns, and is a contributing author on MVP Deep Dives 2.

You can visit his website and blog at TimMitchell.net or follow him on Twitter at @Tim_Mitchell.


Posted by Steve Jones on 26 February 2010

That is a big group, and congrats to you, Sean, Trevor, etc. for keeping such a big group going. Most groups are smaller, especially here. from Boulder, which seems to regularly pull in less than 10, to Denver, which is about 30-40.

The Indy group is large like yours, not I'm not sure it's that large.

I think if someone wants to be a member, and gets something out of the group, then include them. I might require them to show up for a meeting or two a year before they could run for office, but for voting, I'l let them vote. Most of the groups here do votes in person at a specific meeting.

Posted by Jason Brimhall on 26 February 2010

We do it similarly to Steve.  If you want to be a member then you are a member.  I agree with Steve on the elections - participate before running for office.  You need to have some sort of idea who the members are and how the group functions before jumping in and running for office.

Posted by John Magnabosco on 27 February 2010

At our group in Indianapolis, we consider you a member when you register on our website. Our "member list" is over 1,000; but our regular attendance is around 40-60. We do not charge membership fees.

We really make no direct efforts to grow the group larger than this... we make no direct efforts to restrict the size either. I have found that once a group exceeds 90 attendees the entire dynamic changes.

Board elections occur once a year, same time each year. Those who are in attendance of the meeting in which elections occur are able to participate in the election. We have a steering committee that serves as a pool of volunteers, special project committees and future leaders.

Leave a Comment

Please register or log in to leave a comment.