Subscribe to this blog
Briefcase
Print
I guess I did a good job, with all 3s and 4s in my eval (meaning good and great) for the presentation. That was good as I struggled with a projector that cut off my slides (something to be aware of for next time.
In terms of the presentation, here were the items:
|
|
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
|
Session overall: |
|
|
|
|
|
How easy was the Session to understand? |
|
|
2 |
16 |
|
Was the content suited to your requirements? |
|
|
3 |
15 |
|
Were the topics covered in sufficient detail? |
|
|
2 |
17 |
|
Would you recommend this Session to others? |
|
|
1 |
18 |
|
Overall rating of the Session? |
|
|
1 |
13 |
|
|
Poor |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
|
Instructor: |
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to provide real world experience? |
|
|
1 |
18 |
|
Ability to respond appropriately to questions? |
|
|
1 |
12 |
|
How
well prepared was the instructor? |
|
|
3 |
16 |
|
Knowledge of subject matter? |
|
|
1 |
18 |
|
Presentation
abilities? |
|
|
1 |
17 |
|
Overall
rating of instructor? |
|
|
1 |
18 |
The suggestions I got were good, and I had a few that I need to address in the next presentation:
- find examples of people with lower profiles.
- Talk about more differentiation of personal and private profiles
- More on the physical resume
- Talk about privacy items
I'll work on those, and hopefully address some in October when I give this one again.
No comments.