Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in

James Serra's Blog

James is currently a Senior Business Intelligence Architect/Developer and has over 20 years of IT experience. James started his career as a software developer, then became a DBA 12 years ago, and for the last five years he has been working extensively with Business Intelligence using the SQL Server BI stack (SSAS, SSRS, and SSIS). James has been at times a permanent employee, consultant, contractor, and owner of his own business. All these experiences along with continuous learning has helped James to develop many successful data warehouse and BI projects. James has earned the MCITP Business Developer 2008, MCITP Database Administrator 2008, and MCITP Database Developer 2008, and has a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Engineering. His blog is at .

A placement firm’s “guaranteed” replacement

I have heard large placement firms say they are better than smaller firms because “They offer the client a guaranteed replacement in case the resource doesn’t work out or leaves project early “.  I asked my recruiter friend about this.  His response:

You can look at it that statement two ways:

(1) For those with a “glass is half-full” attitude, it shows a firm is committed and won’t leave you hanging if their resource leaves an assignment early, and that they will replace the person if they leave early so you won’t feel any disruption in service

(2) For those that are a little more cynical – it is a sneaky way for the firm to set themselves up for a bait & switch by saying that they’ll replace the person that leaves as they ALREADY KNOW their person is going to leave and they are trying to put a classy spin on it.  Push back on this firm by asking them for either (1) a 90-day warranty period (meaning you don’t pay until their candidate has lasted at least 90 days) or (2) a money back guarantee if their person leaves early

I’d only trust that guarantee as far as I could throw the person who made it (unless you know the firm REALLY well and they are a first class organization).  Otherwise it is all talk and also sets up the firm to pull some smoke and mirrors bait & switch on you.  I’m very leery of this type of a guarantee (if you can’t tell by the tone of my response).

Two comments from me:

(1) But what firm would not offer a “guarantee”?  Just common sense they would look for another resource if theirs left early since they want to continue to make money on a resource.  As opposed to a firm saying “we want nothing to do with you if our resource leaves early so contact another placement company”

(2) Couldn’t this also be a sneaky way for the firm to place a consultant who stinks, hoping the client won’t complain.  If they don’t complain, great, you are making money off a crappy consultant.  If they do complain, no problem, you just go and find a better consultant

Isn’t the guarantee really more helpful to the firm because the client is guaranteeing them they will continue to use them and not switch to another firm if their consultant does not work out?

And my recruiting friends response:

Your last sentence sums it up perfectly.

As for your first point, I personally don’t guarantee a replacement.  I give a 90-day warranty that if my person doesn’t last that long, then the client owes nothing.  I’m hesitant to offer the guarantee as some skill sets are harder to find that others.  And I don’t want to mislead anyone that I’ll be able to pull a rabbit out of my hat twice if a skill set is really scarce.  It is more about managing expectations than avoiding responsibility.


Leave a comment on the original post [, opens in a new window]

Loading comments...