Recently I needed to rearrange some stuff at the office and part of that included moving our install of Quickbooks to a new machine. I purchased the new version online for download, install and moving over the data files went easy enough. The first sign of trouble was registration. I filled in the form online (how many employees, yada, yada) and kept going, then I get to a point where they want me to call in to 'complete' the registration process. Normally I click cancel rapidly at this point, but as we use their payroll service I figured I would have to do it one way or the other, so I called. On hold for a couple minutes, then I get a phone rep that starts asking me exactly the same questions I had answered online 10 minutes earlier. Getting impatient, I declined to answer any more, leaving the phone rep....confused. All I was waiting on was an activation code which for some reason required many minutes to generate. He then tried to get me to answer more questions, no way! Finally I got the code and ended the call. Not a great start, but my own fault for calling.
Everything else worked, but the point where I decided I liked the 2007 version better than 2009 was when it was time to download transactions. I download transactions from the bank and our main credit card, then match up and/or enter as needed, and it's a important part of my week to get it done, and hopefully done quickly. The process wasn't perfect before, but usable. The new version kicks you into a big modal dialog, so if you need to research something you have to close out, find/fix, then go back to processing downloads. Terrible work flow. I guess I'm stuck with it, hoping I can figure out a way to smooth it out - but I shouldn't have to!
I've been a Quicken user forever, and it's ease of use has spoiled me, I swear QB makes things harder than they need to be. Have to wonder if the two teams ever talk.
My friend Wes Dumey does a lot of work in the business intelligence sector as a contract employee and has a post worth reading called The Great Debate - Employee vs. Consulting. I don't agree with all of his points, but it's an interesting conversation to have. I do agree that too many of us seem overly focused on benefits, rather than just looking at the dollar value of the benefits and adjusting the wage accordingly. For example, I pay about $6k a year for health insurance for my family. It doesn't matter if I make $100k and get free insurance, or make $106k and pay my own, I net the same (assuming benefits are comparable/reasonable). The challenge is that employers have to put everyone in the insurance pool to get the rate, and so as an employee you can't negotiate for that extra $6k easily (and the same for the 401k match). But as a contractor, all doors are open - you just have to understand your own costs, financial goals, market value, and then ask!
I don't want to comment much until Wes does part 2, but I'll finish with this; most of us prefer to be employees for three reasons:
Wes has posted Part 2 before I get could this posted, so I'll wait on his Part 3 to finish my thoughts.
First, the usual disclaimer: I'm not a financial professional, so take all of the following with a grain of salt and back it up with some good reading and/or professional advice.
I'm often surprised at the many different ways people look at money. Not my place to say that any of them is wrong either! Instead, what I'd thought I'd do is list a couple positions I take on money because it's part of our industry that we have relatively young people (18-25) making very good money and from what I've seen, most schools don't seem to teach practical financial skills.
There's a lot more to learn, but maybe this will get someone thinking enough to go buy a financial book or two. Money doesn't equal happiness, but not having money doesn't guarantee it either. Learn enough about money to manage your daily life using a pattern, then the only time you need to seek knowledge is when you decide to go a step further - investing, home buying, retirement planning, etc.
Recently I signed up for the FlyClear program (www.flyclear.com), a registered traveler program. Over the past year I've been travelling more than usual and security in Orlando can range from a breeze to having a 1000 people queued, makes the timing a little uncertain and waiting in line isn't much fun. To enroll in clear you fill out an outline form and provide credit card information (about $125), then you go to the airport to provide copies of two of the eligible documents (drivers license, passport, birth certificate, a few others). They scan the documents, then scan your iris and finger prints. Enrollment probably takes 10 mins online, 10 mins at the airport. Then you wait for 3-4 weeks for the background check to be completed and your card sent.
Orlando is one of a handful of airports that have the Clear program, so it's mainly helping me on the flights out. Is it worth what I give up in privacy? They have a decent privacy policy, but I didn't give them any information that isn't reasonably available about me to the government anyway, having been finger printed and background checked as part of my military days. I'm assuming if someone really wanted to investigate me officially they would start with credit cards and that would take them to the airlines anyway. The bigger danger is that the Clear security is compromised, opening up identity theft or really worst case - inserting someone as an authorized traveler that hasn't really been checked.
I'm trading money for time/convenience, more on that philosphy soon! In Orlando you go to the Clear area, scan your card, scan a finger print or iris, and they walk you right up to the xray machine. On good days no real time savings, on bad days easily an hour, plus the stress reduction of not having to worry about missing a flight because you're stuck in line.