Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 

The Incidental DBA

By Andy Warren, 2009/10/02

Total article views: 138 | Views in the last 30 days: 5

Today we have a guest editorial from Andy Warren, founder of SQLServerCentral and member of the PASS Board of Directors.

You may have heard the phrase “accidental DBA” to describe how many in our profession come to be DBA’s, either full or part time. It’s a challenge that’s common to many businesses as they grow to the point of needing someone to take care of database related work. Did you know that there are also many “Incidental DBA’s”? That’s what I call those managers, developers, and business owners that really have no interest (or time) to do anything with SQL Server that doesn’t have to be done. They own SQL Server because their third party software requires it, or they needed something a little more robust than Access to power their web site, but they really aren’t do anything that requires much time or attention.

It’s easy to forget that not everyone has lots of change, lots of data, lots of ‘stuff’ going on. I was doing a presentation at a user group earlier this year and during the follow up discussion someone had a question about maintenance plans and indexing. I answered with my thoughts, and then someone else spoke up and said that they had been in business five years and as far as he knew they had no maintenance plan and had never heard about index defragmentation. His follow up comment was that since performance had been fine, what value would there be in rebuilding indexes? Now that might horrify you as a DBA, but to me it was a great view into a world different than my own. As much as I believe in index rebuilds as part of ongoing maintenance, here was a case where it didn’t matter, and probably won’t matter in another five years either. Even if it does end up causing a problem, it’s an hour fix once someone with some knowledge gets involved. My best answer – a little lacking I thought – was to think of it like routine maintenance on a car, you do it it to head off problems that you otherwise won’t know about until too late.

The tendency is for us power users is to say that users shouldn’t use a product they don’t understand. But in the real world, I drive a car with a automatic transmission. I get the idea, no clue on the details, and if breaks, I’ll take it someone that understands how to fix it. Sometimes we’re going to get those calls and when we fix something, we can share a few ideas about how to prevent it happening again. Incidental DBA’s may or may not listen because SQL Server is something they touch because they have to, and they would much prefer that they didn’t have to touch it at all.

 

By Andy Warren, 2009/10/02

Total article views: 138 | Views in the last 30 days: 5
Your response
 
 
Related Articles
FORUM

Index maintenance

How to convince your colleagues to have index maintenance job

FORUM

Rebuild Index Task fails in Maintenance Plan

Rebuild Index Task fails in Maintenance Plan

FORUM

Error in Index Reorg in Maintenance Task

Error in Index Reorg in Maintenance Task

FORUM

Maintenance Plan For Rebuild index

Maintenance Plan For Rebuild index

FORUM
Tags
editorial    
 
Contribute

Join the most active online SQL Server Community

SQL knowledge, delivered daily, free:

Email address:  

You make SSC a better place

As a member of SQLServerCentral, you get free access to loads of fresh content: thousands of articles and SQL scripts, a library of free eBooks, a weekly database news roundup, a great Q & A platform… And it’s our huge, buzzing community of SQL Server Professionals that makes it such a success.

Join us!

Steve Jones
Editor, SQLServerCentral.com

Already a member? Jump in:

Email address:   Password:   Remember me: Forgotten your password?
Steve Jones