SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
Search:  
 
 

Did Oracle buy MySQL by accident?

By Tony Davis, 2009/08/17

Total article views: 109 | Views in the last 30 days: 9

The wording of the statement about MySQL that came out from Oracle after the merger lacked the enthusiasm that they gave to Java. "MySQL will be an addition to Oracle's existing suite of database products, which already includes Oracle Database 11g, TimesTen, Berkeley DB open source database, and the open source transactional storage engine, InnoDB."

It seemed downbeat. There was no talk of being committed to the growth of MySQL, or any hint of a long term strategy. In fact, the implication was "Oh no! Another Blooming Database to deal with". It was if they'd bought a job-lot of china in a house sale and were bemoaning the surplus of teapots.

It was a strange sentiment from a company that has no credible entry at the lower end of the market. If they improve MySQL with Oracle technology, support it properly, price it keenly so that it represent a lower start-up cost than SQL Server (it will be expected to make more money for Oracle than it did for Sun, surely?) then it could make a very tempting mid-range option, and lead to an interesting pincer movement on SQL Server.

There is a large user base out there whose requirements are satisfied by the likes of SQL 2000, but who need something more than SQL Server Express. MySQL is already way more fully-featured than SQL Server 2000 and will certainly scale a lot further than Express. At its peak, it was attracting more than 70K downloads a day and has huge appeal to the younger generation of developers.

Add to this the 'safety net' of a very smooth upgrade route from MySQL to Oracle, which Oracle Corp will of course provide, and you might have the incentive for companies to go down a path that overcomes any fear they may have had of open source, and avoids SQL Server altogether.

Of course, there is still a fair amount of dust to settle, and other developments to consider, such as the level of support building behind the Melissa fork of the MySQL code base. However, I'm firmly in the camp that cannot believe Oracle acquired MySQL just to let it drift.

As always, we'd love to hear your thoughts.

Cheers,

Tony.

By Tony Davis, 2009/08/17

Total article views: 109 | Views in the last 30 days: 9
Your response
 
 
Related tags

Database Weekly     MySQL    
Editorial     Oracle    
 
Related content

Feature (In)Complete

By Steve Jones | Category: Editorial
(not yet rated) | 186 reads

The Exceptional DBA

By Tony Davis | Category: Editorial
| 761 reads

No XP, but Look Forward To 7

By Steve Jones | Category: Editorial
(not yet rated) | 434 reads

Behind the Curtain

By Steve Jones | Category: Editorial
(not yet rated) | 80 reads
 
Contribute

Free registration required...

To read the rest of this article, and access thousands of other articles, we ask you to register on the site and subscribe to our newsletters.

Login (existing users)

Login

Email:   Password:   Remember me: Forgotten your password?

Register (new users)

Register

Email:   Password:
Confirm:

Subscribing to our newsletters gets you:

  • ALL of our content (thousands of articles, scripts, and forum postings)
  • A daily newsletter (example)
  • A weekly news round up (example)
  • The opportunity to ask and answer questions in our forums
  • A daily Question of the Day to test and help you increase your knowledge of SQL Server.

Steve Jones
Editor, SQLServerCentral.com