SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
Search:  
 
 

Physical File Defragmentation

By Brad McGehee, 2009/05/01

Total article views: 204 | Views in the last 30 days: 6

Editor's Note: Due to a system error, the discussion for this editorial was disabled last Friday. It is being re-run to allow for discussion of the topic.

Do You Include Physical File Defragmentation as Part of Your SQL Server Maintenance?

Ever since I can remember, beginning with MS-DOS 1.0, physical file fragmentation has often been a problem on many systems I have used, hurting I/O performance as the disk heads have to thrash about to find all the many file fragments that make up a single physical file. Generally, using either the built-in OS defragmentation tools, or third-party tools, I have kept my physical files defragmented, so they are contiguous, helping to optimize my system’s I/O.

As technology has changed (SANs or SSD drives) physical file fragmentation has become less important. See Linchi Shea’s blog series on this topic. On the other hand, there are still a lot of servers with local storage that can be still be negatively affected by physical file fragmentation.

When I build a new physical box to run SQL Server, the new box has little or no physical file fragmentation to start with. Then, when I create my MDF and LDF files, I pre-size them to as close as I can to their final size (or at least as large as I expect them to grow in the next year or so). This way, when the MDF and LDF files are created on a new server, they are created in a contiguous manner, and there is no physical file fragmentation. Of course, if I do need to grow the MDF or LDF files, I do so in a controlled manner to minimize fragmentation. I avoid using autogrowth to grow my databases, as this can greatly contribute to file fragmentation as the MDF and LDF files grow over time.

In other cases, I have to deal with SQL Servers that have been around for a long time and have not been properly maintained. In those cases, I check for how bad fragmentation is, and if it is bad, I fix it before I create any new pre-sized MDF or LDF files. As a DBA, I prefer to be proactive and prevent physical file fragmentation from occurring in the first place.

What I would like to know is what has been your experience with physical file fragmentation on your SQL Servers? Have you experienced it? How has it affected performance? How do you fix it if you have it? What defragmentation tools do you use, and why? How do you prevent it from happening in the first place? In other words, how do you deal with physical file fragmentation on your SQL Servers?

By Brad McGehee, 2009/05/01

Total article views: 204 | Views in the last 30 days: 6
Your response
 
 
Related tags

Editorial    
Friday Poll    
 
Related content

Time Off

By Steve Jones | Category: Editorial
| 65 reads

Making Demands

By Steve Jones | Category: Editorial
| 70 reads

The Worst Advice

By Steve Jones | Category: Editorial
| 170 reads
 
Contribute

Free registration required...

To read the rest of this article, and access thousands of other articles, we ask you to register on the site and subscribe to our newsletters.

Login (existing users)

Login

Email:   Password:   Remember me: Forgotten your password?

Register (new users)

Register

Email:   Password:
Confirm:

Subscribing to our newsletters gets you:

  • ALL of our content (thousands of articles, scripts, and forum postings)
  • A daily newsletter (example)
  • A weekly news round up (example)
  • The opportunity to ask and answer questions in our forums
  • A daily Question of the Day to test and help you increase your knowledge of SQL Server.

Steve Jones
Editor, SQLServerCentral.com