Data Migration – Part 1 “Where and How to Start”
This article covers a wide variety of areas
concerned with data migration.
Primarily, it focuses on process, standards and some of the many issues
to consider when undertaking this role.
Example Scenario
Throughout this article I will mention an
example data migration project with the following characteristics. The system is a complete re-write of existing
client server applications to a single integrated data model spanning 3 core
systems. The system is intranet/internet
based using VB 6, Active Directory Services (Win2k AS), SS2k EE, XML, DTS, IIS
5, COM+.
System Summary
Source
Name
|
Tables
|
Summary
|
|
NEWSYS
|
286
|
New corporate data model
|
|
|
|
|
|
APP_A
|
60
|
Application A to be migrated to NEWSYS
1:1 mapping with some system code changes
(remapping) and data merging with other applications.
|
|
APP_B
|
80
|
Application B to be migrated to NEWSYS
60% of all tables require complete
remapping and merging
40% of tables need to merge with APP_A
data (ie. shared data needs to be merged together
to form a unified source of data).
|
|
Other
|
90
|
Reference Data from APP_A, APP_B,
spreadsheets.
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Team Dynamics
1 x Project Manager
1 x DBA
2 x Systems/Business Analysts
(representing APP_A, APP_D and APP_B)
6 x Programmers
1 x Application Architect
Migration Team (made up of people from above list)
1 x DBA
2 x Systems/Business Analysts
2 x Programmers
Broad Summary - Drill Down on Migration and Processes
The following summary does not include the
initial planning phases and standard definitions; this is discussed later in
the article.

Source data; determine load/connectivity
strategy, liase with DBA in building the staging databases (MIG_<name>)
and preparing DTS routine to load data on a regular basis. Document the refresh strategy and test;
deal with performance issues as required.


Development of data cleansing scripts and
other data migration routines, focusing on reference data first and if the
resources are available, working on other scripts in
parallel.
Discuss with DBA indexing strategies for staging databases, rules for
data cleaning if more than one “group” of programmers require the same data
sets.


Data cleansing routines run, typically only once. Reports developed and communication
managed between business owners and analyst to resolve issues as required. All documented in detail and decision
processes tracked.


Migration begins -
primary and foreign keys are always enabled (typically via T-SQL). Concurrency issues discussed and
planned for with migrations teams.
Migration “may” occur in multiple (and identical) MIG_NEWSYS databases if
1 migration team has different requirements to another in terms of performance
and time to load. Even so, the DBA
must have strict control of common reference data, schema configuration to
ensure no issues arise when the teams meet to on common grounds.

General Definitions
NEWSYS
is the name of our new application database.
MIG_NEWSYS
is our dedicated migration database for the app.
<sub-app>
represents an applications database to be merged.
Migration Team & Responsibilities
|
Data Migration
Role |
Data Migration
Responsibilies |
|
Business Owners (users) |
Data cleansing.
Migration testing.
Data mapping and migration business
rule approval.
Final approval and signoff
Sourcing and management of additional
staff to assist migration data cleansing. |
|
Analyst(s) |
Data model.
Adherence and champion to migration
standards.
Mapping of data from source to
destination systems.
Requirements Analysis and ongoing user
liaison.
Inter-system mapping and merging of
data documentation, management and liaison.
Supply migration team with all
associated documentation to complete/change migration scripts and
associated reporting.
Reports to users in all cases with
migration progress.
Liase with project
managers. |
|
Database Administrator |
Physical data model schema
ownership.
Migration document QA and naming
standard checks.
Ownership of all staging databases and
final “migration” databases (schema image of corporate data
model).
Communicate schema changes to all key
analysts and programmers and get approval before any change is
made.
Own the database security
model.
Ongoing standard DBA
tasks. |
|
Application Architect |
Architecture and
methodology
Common libraries
Configuration Management
Standards and QA (not so much
migration)
Technical Support/Special
Projects |
|
Senior Application
Programmer |
Allocation of programming tasks to
programmers.
Provide high level of technical
expertise and assistance to programmers.
Ensure adherence to architecture and
programming standards.
Code walkthrough’s.
Verifies all data merging
tasks.
Verifies all migration reports send to
end-users via Analysts.
Liase closely with analysts with
migration tasks, reporting, impact analysis. |
|
Programmer |
Develops all migration code based on
documentation allocated my senior
programmer. |
End User Management (CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR)
It is very important that the business
owners actually do “own” the data and the associated application redevelopment,
and I mean this actually does extend from the steering committee and executive
meetings out into user land and is not something born from your
imagination. In them doing so, it
is important that you provide your clients with effective reporting mechanisms
throughout the data migration effort.
You must be consistent and firm, as a slip up in a row count from one
month’s data cleansing/migration effort to another can result in a flurry of
sarcastic emails and calls from your managers. The client will invest a significant
about of their time with cleansing and merging of data, and therefore, will
require ongoing statistical reports on their progress, and possible views into
your system for the more advanced user to check up on data merging results.
Reference Data (CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR)
It is not unusual to find that over one
third of all tables are reference data tables. It is very important to get this right
early in the migration, as all systems will depend on it. It is not uncommon for programmers to
embed specific lookups (ie. to address type,
relationship type columns for example) in their code, and as such, changing
it 4 to 6+ weeks into the project will not be pleasurable experience for you and
the programming staff. Even
so, strictly speaking the impact should be measurable so long as well managed
programming standards are employed.
Reference data will be sourced
from:
a)
external data files
b)
incoming staging databases (ie. one system
has the definitive set of data)
c)
one off hard coded
inserts/updates in t-sql code
The standards section of this paper will
discuss naming conventions, but where possible keep t-sql routines that manipulate reference data to a
minimum. Look as using a series of
generic scripts that allows you to quickly reload all reference data at any
time. For example:
sp_msforeachtable "ALTER TABLE ? NOCHECK CONSTRAINT all"
sp_msforeachtable "ALTER TABLE ? DISABLE TRIGGER all"
exec MIG_REFDATA_LoadAll_sp
sp_msforeachtable "ALTER TABLE ? CHECK CONSTRAINT all"
sp_msforeachtable "ALTER TABLE ? ENABLE TRIGGER all"
Use the following DBCC command for
validating foreign keys after each re-load.
DBCC
CHECKCONSTRAINTS WITH ALL_CONSTRAINTS
As a final note, take careful consideration
of reference data that changes regularly to meeting external (and possibly
internal) reporting requirements.
You need to decide how the mapping strategy with work, namely:
a)
will the table cater for the
versioning of reference data?
b)
will the table cater for the
enabling/disabling of reference data items?
c)
will all reference data remapping take
place via views or within the application ?
d)
does your scheme for reference data
versioning apply to all applications using it?
Migration Step 0 – Define Standards and Process
The DBA should clearly define the standards
to be used for all objects created in the MIG_NEWSYS database. I have successfully used the
following:
[MIG] database user
All migration “users” will be connecting
as the [MIG] user. This user has
DBO access to the MIG_NEWSYS database and all associated MIG_<sub-app>
databases. Why?
- simple to move scripts between servers and DB’s as required
- simple to identify migration scripts over other users
- easier to maintain security and control over mig users
- do
not have to give SA access or other higher privs
- can
quickly revoke access without any impact
Database do’s and
don’ts for the MIG user:
- Don’t – create any objects in the MIG_<sub-app> (staging
databases) or remote databases.
- Do –
always login as the MIG user
- Do –
always follow the standards listed below
- Do –
manage your own script change control (including t-sql stored procedures, UDF’s,
views, tables).
- Don’t – remove data on shared tables
- Don’t – edit stored t-sql code without
adding comments as to the purpose of the change.
- Do –
carefully document your changes to all migration code
- Do –
complete code headers and dependency maps
File System Layout and Process Documentation
All migration team members work off a
generic file structure. This is
very important for DTS routines and obviously for ease of administration during
the migration process. The
directory structure may vary significantly between projects, but a based set may
be:
Note:
myApp = source system name to be merged into
corporate data model.

NOTE: Make sure this is a common drive map for all
developers (ie. same drive/path)
1.
Common directory
i.
Generic script – all common
utility scripts and command line tools.
ii.
Merge data – includes all
spreadsheets, Access DB’s or CSV files etc that have manually merged data for
the corporate database to link two or more applications together. This area is critical and must be
updated at a minimum. It will be used my a variety if
people to approved the merging of records for subsequent data loads via DTS.
iii.
Security data – optional and
depends of your security framework within your application. Includes data files listing base security
privileges and system parameters to be loaded into the corporate data model for
the migrated applications.
2.
Documentation directory
i.
MyApp – documentation specific to the application. Base documentation templates will come from
the directory below it and have created and managed by the DBA or analyst. This document has the step my step processes
to load and report on a data migration for the application.
ii.
Standards and Templates -
includes code templates, migration document templates, naming conventions and
associated standards.
iii.
System Merge - information
about the merging of data from one application to another, and the rules
associated with the merge. Typically
these are signed off my data owners and are pivotal for the merge process.
3.
IncomingSourceSystemData directory
i.
MyApp – copies of production databases (optional) ready for loading via
DTA into the staging database(s).
Multiple backup copies may be required.
General Naming Standards
Standards are critical for a successful
migration as the amount of code can grow dramatically over time. In all cases the purpose of an object (see
below) should be short, to the point and documented.
DTS packages
<newsys>
- MIG - <purpose> loading
reference data, staging databases etc.
Generic Utility T-SQL Code
mig.UTILITY_<purpose>_sp generic
utility t-sql code, ie.
stip <cr>
etc
T-SQL Code
mig.MIG_REFDATA_<name>_sp single to many procs to load reference data,
may
utilise remapping tables or call other remapping stored procedures.
mig.MIG_LOAD_<sub-app>_<purpose>_sp migration code specific to the sub-app
mig.MIG_REMAP_<name>_sp remapping specific
stored procs (optional)
Tables
mig.MIG_REFDATA_<name> staging reference data
mig.MIG_REMAP_<purpose> remapping data tables,
optionally add <sub-app>
mig.MIG_<sub-app>_<purpose> staging and other tables specific to
app mig
mig.MIG_System_Log logging of all errors
etc during running of stored procs
mig.MIG_Conversion_Matrix to map old p.keys
to the new p.keys (where applic.)
Views
mig.MIG_sub-app>_<purpose> custom
views
Tracking, Error handling and Transactions
The MIG_SYSTEM_LOG table should be used to
track long running jobs, alternatively, the programmer may chose
text files (especially if they are writing code in VB). This is not mandatory but available for
use. The developer must take
responsibility with:
a)
clearing data from the table (and not affecting other users), this can be
cater for the with the columns SystemLogIntendedFor or SystemLogByWhom and of course the date column for the table (see table structure
below). The DBA may need to setup
indexing and of course monitor space usage.
Ideally, the DBA should set physical database limits to manage disk
space or proactive monitoring scripts.
With T-SQL, the developer must determine:
a)
what constitutes a transaction and a valid record or set of
records. Take care with transaction
management and ensure all transactions are counted for,
you don’t want the DBA killing off an apparently stalled job only to find SQL
Server rolls it back.
b)
whether the first set of steps
in the script is the remove all previously inserted data (in key order) in case
then script is being run for a second, third of more times (typically due to
error).
c)
When to break out of the code
and how? (do you need to cascade errors up the chain
of code calls?)
Here are some examples code snippets:
<...>
<mysql statement>
set
@v_error_count = @v_error_count
+ @@ERROR
<...>
if @v_error_count > 0 begin
print 'Error @ employer#
'
print @emp_id
raiserror('Error in - MIG_MYAPP_Load_Employers_sp', 16,1)
while @@TRANCOUNT > 0
ROLLBACK
TRAN
RETURN
1
end
<...>
In the data models I have worked with, all
tables had these columns (or similar to):
last_update_count integer default 0 not
null
last_update_on datetime default getdate() not null
last_update_by varchar(50) <no default, app user> not null
Therefore, standards were defined for
record marking as they came to in easily remove records that belonged to your
particular migration script. If you do
not have this, look at using the matrix table (see next) to identify your rows
verses existing data.
Core Migration Tables and Stored Procedures
The migration effort will result in data
being remapped, requirements to track the progress of long running stored
procedures, and operate simultaneously with other migration tasks underway in
other areas of the corporate data model.
As such, we require some pre-defined and documented tables to ensure
based migration concurrency and auditing:
Conversion Matrix
This table tracks all new/old value
remapping during data migration (where appropriate).
CREATE TABLE [mig].[MIG_CONVERSION_MATRIX] (
[table] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL ,
[typeof] [varchar]
(80) NOT NULL ,
[newkey1] [varchar]
(50) NULL ,
[newkey2]
[varchar]
(50) NULL ,
[newkey3]
[varchar]
(50) NULL ,
[newkey4]
[varchar]
(50) NULL ,
[oldkey1]
[varchar]
(50) NULL ,
[oldkey2]
[varchar]
(50) NULL ,
[oldkey3]
[varchar]
(50) NULL ,
[oldkey4]
[varchar]
(50) NULL ,
[notes] [varchar] (100) NULL
,
[lastupdated] [datetime]
NOT NULL ,
[lastupdatedby] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
System Logging /
Tracking
Used to tracks data migration activity and
progress.
CREATE TABLE [mig].[MIG_System_Log] (
[SystemLogId] [decimal](18, 0) IDENTITY
(1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[SystemLogDetails] [varchar] (2000) NOT NULL ,
[SystemLogTypeCode] [varchar] (25) NOT
NULL ,
[SystemObjectAffected] [varchar] (50) NULL ,
[SystemLogDate] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[SystemLogByWhom] [varchar] (50) NULL ,
[SystemLogIntendedFor] [varchar] (20) NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
Migration Step 1 – Staging Database(s) and Sourcing Data
The first step is to establish the MIG_
databases. If the temporary MIG_
databases are not possible then read-only linked servers may be used. Even so, never link to production
databases for whatever reason. The MIG_
databases will be loaded often from their production system counterparts, and
as such, must be repeatable and quick to run.
I use DTS for a majority of the work here.
The major advantages to creating the MIG_
databases are:
-
can run “pre-migration data fix” scripts against the data before we
begin the major load
-
once in SQL Server, its very easily to transform and query data rather
than dealing with flat files or other database formats and syntax
-
we have complete CRUD control

In the end it’s the DBA’s
call. Very large data sources may be a
problem and the time to load and build the MIG_ databases may be unacceptable. Even so look at a staged approach to the
migration to resolve.
The regularity of the load will increase
near the end of the data migration process and during initial testing. The DBA may choose to script the databases to
easy of restoration. Be careful that
replacing databases may impact multiple migration team members and can result
in complete reloads of reference data etc associated with the staged data. Also be aware that a support server
may also need to be refreshed in order for users to compare their production
database snapshot with the migrated data set.
Look at indexing the MIG_ database tables
to speed your extraction and querying of migration data, and always use a fill
factor of 95% (you will never insert new data and the updates will be minimal).
Migration Step 2 – Load Core Reference Data
Up next we have the T-SQL stored procedure
and DTS routines to load in the core application reference data. You will be surprised how many tables are
reference data tables, at times being over 1/3 of the total tables.
Reference data is critical. I cannot highlight the importance of
well-defined, accurate reference data as early as humanly possible. Why? For these fundamental reasons
impact
the developers – who hard code ID lookups, eg. 1 = Postal Address type and 2 =
Guardian, if you swapped these two months into the project then be
prepared to wear a helmet.
change of codes or addition of missing codes can mean complete UAT and/or
testing of coded logic to ensure the program still works.
can delay development as no data means no code cutting.
Reference data is not too difficult to
source and most codes will be retained from the incoming systems. There will be a small percentage of tables
that require code remapping. To mange
reference data and remapping, I set-up the following spreadsheets:
refdata.xls – 1
sheet per incoming table
remap.xls
– 1 sheet per table for remapping.
This maps to a single MIG_REMAP_<purpose> table within the
MIG_NEWSYS database.
Not all reference data is kept in the
spreadsheet, data may be transformed within a single t-sql
routine to complete the load from the staging databases based on general
agreement from all business owners.
This can cause issues with managing the
reference data loads

Spreadsheets are an easy way to maintain
lists of reference data outside of the scope of other incoming migrated data
sources. A single stored procedure
should be developed to process all reference data. Use staging tables for reference data within
MIG_NEWSYS, eg. mig.MIG_REFDATA_<name>.
Migration Step 3 – Ongoing Scripting and Loading of Core
Data
It is very important that the migration
database schema is kept fully in-sync with the other development database. The only trick here to watch out for is
scripting changes from Enterprise Manager and running them in development may
work fine, but in the migration database you thousands of extra rows etc,
timing a change may require a little more timing. I have always kept a strict control of DDL in
all database environments to better manage change, if this is a problem for you
the look at schema comparison tools such as those available from red-gate
software.
The DBA should also consider scripting the
databases once per week for safety sake more than anything. This is of course on top of your daily
backups. It is very rare that your
staging and migration databases require anything more than full backups once
per day, and possible twice if you consider a possible
one-day loss too great. Don’t forget
though that databases are one thing, but your file
system with merge data and associated documentation is also critical.
The timing of staging database reloads
needs to be planned with end-users and all affected migration team members. A reload of a staging database may coincide
with the refresh of the production database on your staging server for example
so end-users can report on the staging database to compare data with the
migration effort.
Migration Step 4 – Merge and Remapping Data
Data merging is one of the most difficult
tasks in the migration progress. You
must be very careful here simply because people will be investing large amounts
of their time and money mapping one data value to another and do not want to be
told days or even weeks down the track that what they have been doing is no
longer relevant. This can happen for a
variety of reasons, but change of key is a typical gotcha.
As an example of data merging, I had two
key systems that worked with traineeship data (a traineeship being a 2,3 or 4 yr contract between an employer and a student to
undertaking on the job training in their chosen field, i.e. plumber). The problem here is one system had the
apparent “definitive and fully accredited” set of traineeships but is wasn’t
their core buss to manage students doing them, verses the other system whose
job it was to track, manage and maintain traineeship contracts. Therefore, both had lists of “valid”
traineeship codes and the associated qualification for the traineeship, and
both business areas wanted their data.
In order to do this, we:
a)
Load System A
in first – this had the formally “approved” set of traineeships and
qualification data. Identity value were
fixed on a set range for these particular tables to cater for ensure expansion
(yes – the systems still work as per normal while you are migrating).
b)
Load in remapping tables
c)
Load System B based on mapping
table data.
The merge spreadsheets (remapping data) can
be difficult to produce. Ours consisted
of a series of sheets. The first has the
1:1 mapping to date of System A data with System B
data (and their p.keys). The last column was an approved flag
(Y or N) to denote a merge approval.
Other spreadsheets includes all data values from System A and other
sheet for System B, then a final sheet that had both systems data ordered by
the description of the traineeship to assist users in locating “similar”
records. Of course, this sounds all fine
and dandy, but producing the sheets is tough.
Look for a common ground for merging data over (id fields, descriptions,
combinations of field etc). The critical
part here is making sure that you have all the data necessary to map back to
System A and B to complete the merge as stated in the spreadsheet. Don’t forget also to run scripts over the
mapping tables from time to time to locate missing or new codes from the
systems when new snapshots are taken.
Migration Step 5 – Core Data Migration
When I say “core data migration”, I am
talking about the series of scripts that are run after staging databases are
refreshed and cleansed and reference data has been loaded and vali