﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral.com Content tagged Security, Miscellaneous, Programming</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/</link><description>Content tagged Security, Miscellaneous, Programming posted on SQLServerCentral.com</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>360</ttl><managingEditor>sjones@sqlservercentral.com (Steve Jones)</managingEditor><item><title>Free Encryption</title><description>Free SQL Server 2000 Encryption for your data!!! Author Michael Coles has put together a tolljit and some XPs that you can use to encrypt your data with the Blowfish algorithm. It is hard to write good applications that encrpyt data and manage the keys and security. This will give you a great headstart on protecting your data.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/freeencryption/1980/</guid><pubDate>2008/04/25</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/freeencryption/1980/</link></item><item><title>Free Encryption</title><description>Free SQL Server 2000 Encryption for your data!!! Author Michael Coles has put together a tolljit and some XPs that you can use to encrypt your data with the Blowfish algorithm. It is hard to write good applications that encrpyt data and manage the keys and security. This will give you a great headstart on protecting your data.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/freeencryption/1980/</guid><pubDate>2008/04/25</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/freeencryption/1980/</link></item><item><title>Dynamic SQL or Stored Procedure</title><description>We&amp;#39;ve had a lot of coverage of dynamic sql (including another great one from Robert Marda later this week) but this one is a little different. Done in a question/answer format, Andy tries to explain to junior developers why dynamic sql is to be avoided, how to do so, what to do when you can&amp;#39;t.


</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning/dynamicsqlorstoredprocedure/969/</guid><pubDate>2005/08/26</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning/dynamicsqlorstoredprocedure/969/</link></item><item><title>Free Encryption</title><description>Free SQL Server 2000 Encryption for your data!!! Author Michael Coles has put together a tolljit and some XPs that you can use to encrypt your data with the Blowfish algorithm. It is hard to write good applications that encrpyt data and manage the keys and security. This will give you a great headstart on protecting your data.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/freeencryption/1980/</guid><pubDate>2008/04/25</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/freeencryption/1980/</link></item><item><title>Stop SQL Injection Attacks Before They Stop You</title><description>A new article from MSDN magazine on stopping SQL Injection attacks by examining how the SQL can be exploited. It&amp;#39;s a good basic article for developers as well as DBAs who might have to review code.</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/1470/</guid><pubDate>2004/08/20</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/1470/</link></item><item><title>RC4 Encryption in a Stored Procedure</title><description>Joseph gathered together some various bits of code and came up with a solution that lets you do RC4 encryption via the sp_oa~ procedures.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/rc4encryptioninastoredprocedure/1254/</guid><pubDate>2004/01/09</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/rc4encryptioninastoredprocedure/1254/</link></item><item><title>Worst Practice - Bad Connection Strings and Bad Info in Sysprocesses</title><description>Andy returns to the Worst Practice series this week with a short article looking at how connection strings in applications affect what you see in sysprocesses. Perhaps less controversial (in our opinion) that some of the other worst practices, this is something easy to fix and definitely worth fixing! Read the article and post a comment - explore other points of view! Readers posting a comment will be entered in a drawing for a copy of the SQL Server 2000 Resource Kit.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/worstpracticebadconnectionstringsandbadinfoinsyspr/802/</guid><pubDate>2003/08/01</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/worstpracticebadconnectionstringsandbadinfoinsyspr/802/</link></item><item><title>Dynamic SQL or Stored Procedure</title><description>We&amp;#39;ve had a lot of coverage of dynamic sql (including another great one from Robert Marda later this week) but this one is a little different. Done in a question/answer format, Andy tries to explain to junior developers why dynamic sql is to be avoided, how to do so, what to do when you can&amp;#39;t.


</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning/dynamicsqlorstoredprocedure/969/</guid><pubDate>2005/08/26</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning/dynamicsqlorstoredprocedure/969/</link></item><item><title>The Case for SQL Logins - Part Two</title><description>In this follow up to one of our most popular articles, Andy responds to comments posted by readers and discusses how to manage SQL logins effectively in your applications.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/thecaseforsqlloginsparttwo/780/</guid><pubDate>2002/08/19</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/thecaseforsqlloginsparttwo/780/</link></item><item><title>The Case for SQL Logins - Part 1</title><description>Andy says Windows Authentication &amp;#34;is bad&amp;#34;. What? That&amp;#39;s not what Microsoft says! Heck, that&amp;#39;s not even what we say! Everyone knows NT authentication is the way to go. Then again, when was the last time Andy wrote an article that wasn&amp;#39;t worth reading?! Read the article, rate it and add a comment - and automatically be entered in a drawing for a copy of SQL Server 2000 Performance Tuning donated by Microsoft Press.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/thecaseforsqlloginspart1/714/</guid><pubDate>2002/06/25</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/thecaseforsqlloginspart1/714/</link></item><item><title>Enforcing Security in Multi-Tier Applications</title><description>The major part of the article, however, is dedicated to a topic that often confuses people and leads to some of the strongest disagreements among IT professionals and developers: the benefits and drawbacks of enforcing security in the middle (or business) tier versus the data tier.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/558/</guid><pubDate>2001/12/25</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/558/</link></item></channel></rss>