﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral.com Content tagged Database Design, System Development Life Cycle</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/</link><description>Content tagged Database Design, System Development Life Cycle posted on SQLServerCentral.com</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>360</ttl><managingEditor>sjones@sqlservercentral.com (Steve Jones)</managingEditor><item><title>SQL Server Database Requirements</title><description>In our organization, I have noticed that database requirements are never included as a portion of the system requirements. The requirements always focus on the interface and we derive the database design from the interface as well as fill in some of the gaps.</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/62573/</guid><pubDate>2008/03/26</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/62573/</link></item><item><title>Worst Practices - Objects Not Owned by DBO</title><description>Last week Andy launched a new series about Worst Practices by talking about why the Hungarian naming convention is bad for column names. This week he&amp;#39;s at it again, declaring that the practice of having objects owned by anyone other than dbo is BAD! Agree or disagree, we think you&amp;#39;ll enjoy reading this article and adding your thoughts to the discussion!


</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/System+Development+Life+Cycle/worstpracticesobjectsnotownedbydbo/480/</guid><pubDate>2004/11/12</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/System+Development+Life+Cycle/worstpracticesobjectsnotownedbydbo/480/</link></item><item><title>Worst Practices - Objects Not Owned by DBO</title><description>Last week Andy launched a new series about Worst Practices by talking about why the Hungarian naming convention is bad for column names. This week he&amp;#39;s at it again, declaring that the practice of having objects owned by anyone other than dbo is BAD! Agree or disagree, we think you&amp;#39;ll enjoy reading this article and adding your thoughts to the discussion!


</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/System+Development+Life+Cycle/worstpracticesobjectsnotownedbydbo/480/</guid><pubDate>2004/11/12</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/System+Development+Life+Cycle/worstpracticesobjectsnotownedbydbo/480/</link></item><item><title>Designing a Flexible Task Management Database</title><description>In this article by Jamie Voss, he shows the methodology he used to develop his task management database.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Basics/designingaflexibletaskdb/688/</guid><pubDate>2002/05/20</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Basics/designingaflexibletaskdb/688/</link></item></channel></rss>