﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral.com Articles tagged Strategies, Availability</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/</link><description>Articles tagged Strategies, Availability posted on SQLServerCentral.com</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>360</ttl><managingEditor>sjones@sqlservercentral.com (Steve Jones)</managingEditor><item><title>Low-Cost High Availability: Simple Database Monitoring in a Windows En</title><description>The .NET Framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 make it easy to create a basic but extensible database-monitoring solution without a lot of complexity or coding. </description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/2618/</guid><pubDate>2006/10/18</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/2618/</link></item><item><title>Stress Testing SQL Server</title><description>Properly sizing your SQL Server hardware and testing application loads against them is a complex and difficult topic. Anthony Bressi brings us a great new article that gives you a systematic approach to performing your own stress test.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Miscellaneous/2634/</guid><pubDate>2006/10/10</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Miscellaneous/2634/</link></item><item><title>Monitoring SQL Servers Availability</title><description>How many SQL Server instances are you running? Do you ever have customers calling you stating that their application is not working, then when you research the problem you find that the instance that supports their application is unavailable? Have you ever had someone mistakenly shutdown the SQL Agent service and forget to restart it, causing a number of scheduled jobs to not be run? One of the tasks of a DBA is to monitor the availability of all SQL Server instances and services.</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/2540/</guid><pubDate>2006/08/10</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/2540/</link></item><item><title>Server Consolidation</title><description>Are you thinking about consolidating your SQL Servers on to fewer machines? It is an interesting idea and one that is definitely more possible with SQL Server 2005 and 64-bit servers. Steve Jones takes a look at some of the pros and cons of moving to fewer servers.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Availability/serverconsolidation/2330/</guid><pubDate>2006/03/15</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Availability/serverconsolidation/2330/</link></item><item><title>Rebuilding SQL Server Cluster Nodes</title><description>Active/Passive SQL Server 2000 clustering gives more reliability and fault tolerance to Production SQL Server environments. When a failure occurs, all of the resources fail over from the active node to the passive node and make the passive node active. This article explains how to rebuild the node that failed and attach it back to the cluster.</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/1714/</guid><pubDate>2005/02/10</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/1714/</link></item><item><title>Custom Log Shipping</title><description>One of our favorite authors is back with a great how-to on log shipping. This isn&amp;#39;t the baked in log shipping, this is a code your own solution that gives you a starting point for your situation. Even if you don&amp;#39;t need it now, it&amp;#39;s worth looking at to gain a better understanding of how shipping works.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/customlogshipping/1201/</guid><pubDate>2003/11/26</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/customlogshipping/1201/</link></item><item><title>Should you buy a SAN?</title><description>Andy recently implemented a SAN and shares some of the info he picked up during the purchase and implementation. This article also discusses briefly the differences between SAN and NAS, and has some links to other sites for more info as well.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Miscellaneous/shouldyoubuyasan/941/</guid><pubDate>2003/03/28</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Miscellaneous/shouldyoubuyasan/941/</link></item><item><title>Server Hardware Standards</title><description>Standards are important in the computer business, both the hardware and software side. After looking at Coding Standards in a previous series, Steve Jones looks at the server side of standards beginning with hardware.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/serverhardwarestandards/878/</guid><pubDate>2003/01/30</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/serverhardwarestandards/878/</link></item><item><title>Worst Practices - Making On-The-Fly Changes</title><description>Continuing with our worst practices series, Steve Jones looks at another administrative no-no. Making a change to your live system on the fly.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Availability/worstpracticesmakingalivechange/887/</guid><pubDate>2003/01/20</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Availability/worstpracticesmakingalivechange/887/</link></item><item><title>Who Needs Change Management?</title><description>You have spent thousands of dollars on that cool technology; clustering, redundant controllers, redundant disks, redundant power supplies, redundant NIC cards, multiple network drops, fancy tape backup devices and the latest and greatest tape technology. You are all set. There is no way your going to have downtime. Right?
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Miscellaneous/whoneedschangemanagement/897/</guid><pubDate>2003/01/16</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Miscellaneous/whoneedschangemanagement/897/</link></item><item><title>Another Disaster (Almost)</title><description>Andy had a semi-disaster similar to the one he wrote about last year. Interesting to see the kinds of problems that happen to other people. This article raises some interesting points that are outside the scope of basic disaster recovery, looking at how/when to move databases to a different server and how to reduce the server load dynamically.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/anotherdisasteralmost/881/</guid><pubDate>2003/01/14</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/anotherdisasteralmost/881/</link></item><item><title>Disaster In The Real World - #2</title><description>Back in April Steve Jones wrote up a disaster at work. Andy had one this week and wrote up the story too. Copy cat! Pretty soon everyone will be having a disaster and writing a story about it! Give these guys credit for letting you see what happens when it ALL goes bad. Disaster recovery is hard to sell and hard to do, reading the article might give you an idea that will save you some time and/or data one day.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/disasterintherealworld2/747/</guid><pubDate>2002/07/31</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/disasterintherealworld2/747/</link></item><item><title>Is 0% Downtime Possible?</title><description>Steve Jones examines the possible notion that a system can achieve 0% downtime. Read on to see if he thinks it&amp;#39;s possible.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Disaster+Recovery/is0downtimepossible/600/</guid><pubDate>2002/02/25</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Disaster+Recovery/is0downtimepossible/600/</link></item><item><title>SQL Server 7.0 Log Shipping Frequently Asked Questions</title><description>This article addresses some common questions about the Log Shipping tool for Microsoft SQL Server 7.0.
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/284/</guid><pubDate>2001/07/02</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/284/</link></item><item><title>Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Reliability</title><description>Lots of people are designing and building Microsoft Windows-based apps with previously unimagined reliability. Starbucks, GMAC, and FreeMarkets.com all have case studies demonstrating five nines. So, how are these companies able to achieve these levels of reliability?This month I am going to show you how to use standard Microsoft Windows technologies to make your Microsoft SQL Server™ app just like Denny&amp;#39;s—“always open” and ready for business. 
</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/255/</guid><pubDate>2001/06/05</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/255/</link></item><item><title>SQL Server 7.0 and 2000 Clustering Resources </title><description>A good place to start before clustering. Written by Brad McGhee, the founder of sql-server-performance.com.</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/233/</guid><pubDate>2001/05/29</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/redirect/articles/233/</link></item></channel></rss>