﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral.com Content tagged Editorial, SMO</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/</link><description>Content tagged Editorial, SMO posted on SQLServerCentral.com</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>360</ttl><managingEditor>sjones@sqlservercentral.com (Steve Jones)</managingEditor><item><title>Little Love Lost for SMO</title><description><![CDATA[<p>SMO is a very useful way of automating a wide range of routine database jobs, but Phil Factor laments Microsoft's apparent ambivalence towards the technology, including a lack of anything remotely resembling adequate documentation.</p>]]></description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Editorial/77292/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:00:00 UT</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Editorial/77292/</link></item><item><title>Is Microsoft neglecting SMO?</title><description><![CDATA[<p>Phil Fator, the self-confessed wild man of T-SQL, finally comes clean: he's a secret PowerShell user. But for the DBA, what is PowerShell without SMO? Is Microsoft giving the latter the care and attention it needs?</p>]]></description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Editorial/72655/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 07:00:00 UT</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Editorial/72655/</link></item></channel></rss>