﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral.com Articles tagged Miscellaneous, Monitoring, Replication</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/</link><description>Articles tagged Miscellaneous, Monitoring, Replication posted on SQLServerCentral.com</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>360</ttl><managingEditor>sjones@sqlservercentral.com (Steve Jones)</managingEditor><item><title>Review of SQL 2000 Fast Answers</title><description>A monster book at 980 pages, it&amp;#39;s written in &amp;#39;how-to&amp;#39; format and has a ton of good material. Andy gave it the once over for us and reports back - see what he thinks!

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Installation/reviewofsql2000fastanswers/959/</guid><pubDate>2003/04/18</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Installation/reviewofsql2000fastanswers/959/</link></item><item><title>The Case for SQL Logins - Part 1</title><description>Andy says Windows Authentication &amp;#34;is bad&amp;#34;. What? That&amp;#39;s not what Microsoft says! Heck, that&amp;#39;s not even what we say! Everyone knows NT authentication is the way to go. Then again, when was the last time Andy wrote an article that wasn&amp;#39;t worth reading?! Read the article, rate it and add a comment - and automatically be entered in a drawing for a copy of SQL Server 2000 Performance Tuning donated by Microsoft Press.

</description><guid>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/thecaseforsqlloginspart1/714/</guid><pubDate>2002/06/25</pubDate><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administering/thecaseforsqlloginspart1/714/</link></item></channel></rss>