|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:05 AM
Points: 1,103,
Visits: 1,200
|
|
Tom.Thomson (10/5/2010)
Nice question. But is there something wrong with the documentation? The BoL page referenced states @@TRANCOUNT is incremented by one when entering a trigger, even when in autocommit mode. (The system treats a trigger as an implied nested transaction.) which suggests that the two rows logged for the insert of value 2 (which occurred in an explicit transaction) should have tc = 2 not tc = 1. I don't know. You are right but experiments show this behaviour. Many times I read BOL or some other documentation I feel like being in the helicopter.
See, understand, learn, try, use efficient © Dr.Plch
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:25 PM
Points: 7,110,
Visits: 7,184
|
|
honza.mf (10/5/2010) I don't know. You are right but experiments show this behaviour. Many times I read BOL or some other documentation I feel like being in the helicopter.
BoL often makes me feel like that. And the experiment in this case shows another oddity: when in autocommit mode, a reference to @@tc in the statement bring auto-committed will be evaluated before the transaction is started (hence the 0 count in the first and fourth rows).
I've written quite a lot of things that look at @@tc for various reasons, but results like these make me very very careful about doing it!
Tom Is minic a gheibheann béal oscailte dorn dúnta. Is minig a cheapas beul fosgailte dòrn dùinte.
|
|
|
|