<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=15220&wd=468&ht=60&pair=as" target="_blank"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=15220&wd=468&ht=60&pair=as" alt="i" width="468" height="60"/></a>
Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=15491&wd=120&ht=300&pair=as" target="_top"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=15491&wd=120&ht=300&pair=as" alt="i" width="120" height="300"/></a>
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
SQL Server 2005
»
Administering
»
Blowing off the SAS70 auditors
Blowing off the SAS70 auditors
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
Indianrock
Indianrock
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 6:33 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:18 PM
Points: 564,
Visits: 1,466
I sat in a SAS70 audit meeting yesterday on database administration. The auditor was very young. One of the first answers I gave him was that nobody in our company has the title "Database Administrator" ( yet ). I let our IT manager answer the questions about backups, but as that progressed I could see he was essentially brow-beating the young auditor and acting as if "we know what we're doing and don't have to prove it to you, whippersnapper."
Obviously I'm beginning to think this manager is more liability than asset. The auditor's questions ended shortly thereafter about 10 minutes into the meeting. I'd be really surprised if he didn't give a negative report to his superiors. Something tells me you can't just blow these people off
Post #964200
GilaMonster
GilaMonster
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 6:38 AM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:31 PM
Points: 38,091,
Visits: 30,384
If he's anything like the SOX auditors I used to work with, he'll be asking for proof of everything you said - backup histories, security permissions, sign-offs, etc.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP
SQL In The Wild
: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
Post #964205
Indianrock
Indianrock
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 7:34 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:18 PM
Points: 564,
Visits: 1,466
Yes, I'm sure we haven't heard the end of this.
Post #964254
Michael Valentine Jones
Michael Valentine Jones
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 7:49 AM
SSCrazy
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:14 PM
Points: 2,969,
Visits: 10,615
There is no law that says that you have to answer their questions, but it can cause problems.
SAS 70 is an auditing standard designed to enable an independent auditor to evaluate and issue an opinion on a service organization's controls, and is meant for customers, investors, etc. to assure them that your organization can process and safeguard their data. If the auditors report that there is no assurance that proper care is being taken to safeguard data, a customer may decide to take their business elsewhere.
When I deal with auditors, I insist that all questions coming to me have to be cleared by our data security team and sent to me by them. This gives me a buffer against direct confrontations of the type you described, gives me time to prepare responses, and shows the auditors that I am protective of all aspects of data security. If there are questions that I have objections to, I discuss them with our data security team before providing an answer.
Youi may want to look at this:
http://sas70.com/
Post #964271
Indianrock
Indianrock
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 8:11 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:18 PM
Points: 564,
Visits: 1,466
In our case the auditor was asking basic questions about restoring backups from tape occasionally to verify their integrity and the manager was giving him the evil eye as if he had no right to ask such a question. If the auditors don't push back big-time I will lose all respect for their organization.
Post #964297
Michael Valentine Jones
Michael Valentine Jones
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 9:41 AM
SSCrazy
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:14 PM
Points: 2,969,
Visits: 10,615
Indianrock (8/5/2010)
In our case the auditor was asking basic questions about restoring backups from tape occasionally to verify their integrity and the manager was giving him the evil eye as if he had no right to ask such a question. If the auditors don't push back big-time I will lose all respect for their organization.
It would probably be better to just say you do, since that would be hard to verify.
Post #964408
Indianrock
Indianrock
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 9:55 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:18 PM
Points: 564,
Visits: 1,466
This is more about " do the auditors have the right to ask us questions," than "how do we verify that what we're saying to them is factual.
Post #964424
Michael Valentine Jones
Michael Valentine Jones
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 10:02 AM
SSCrazy
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:14 PM
Points: 2,969,
Visits: 10,615
Indianrock (8/5/2010)
This is more about " do the auditors have the right to ask us questions," than "how do we verify that what we're saying to them is factual.
Of course they have the right to ask questions.
I think the real question is what they can do about it if they don't get answers. The short answer is they can't really do anything about it, except complain to the company management and/or write it up in the audit report. What happens after that is a decision for the company management.
Post #964433
alen teplitsky
alen teplitsky
Posted Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:00 AM
Ten Centuries
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 10, 2013 10:43 AM
Points: 1,411,
Visits: 4,517
we do SOX once a year
we get a document and have to provide screen shots and other proof. the auditors have a checklist they go by. then they ask for more proof and "clarification". it's kind of like getting a mortgage
https://plus.google.com/100125998302068852885/posts?hl=en
http://twitter.com/alent1234
x-box live gamertag: i am null
[url=http://live.xbox.com/en-US/MyXbox/Profile[/url]
Post #964506
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.
