Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
SQLServerCentral.com
»
Editorials
»
Houston, we have a problem
17 posts, Page 2 of 2
««
1
2
Houston, we have a problem
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
Phil Factor
Phil Factor
Posted Monday, August 02, 2010 8:13 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, May 19, 2013 4:00 AM
Points: 533,
Visits: 2,285
Relational databases aren't supposed to be "simple" minded;
The overwhelming cost of a database application usually turns out to be the cost of training, the cost of integrating the data with the rest of the enterprise, and the cost of maintaining the system. Saving the cost of the actual database system turns out to be an irrelevance. Some of the most expensive database systems I've come across have been intended as the 'cheapest'. There are good reasons for choosing a Cloud solution but saving costs isn't necessarily one of them
Best wishes,
Phil Factor
Simple Talk
Post #962222
P Jones
P Jones
Posted Monday, August 09, 2010 2:44 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:35 AM
Points: 515,
Visits: 1,016
Microsoft ruined their one decent database design tool when they bought out Visio - it was great before they got their mitts on it especially for object role modelling design and then they seemed to deprecate this and removed the "create database from model" facility. I still have Visio 2000 around because it worked.
Post #965777
calspot
calspot
Posted Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:12 PM
SSC-Enthusiastic
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:12 PM
Points: 105,
Visits: 28
< sigh > I miss create from model....
Post #970754
Michael Valentine Jones
Michael Valentine Jones
Posted Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:37 PM
SSCrazy
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:01 PM
Points: 2,944,
Visits: 10,504
rbalmf (8/1/2010)
Sure, we've invested so much money and 10 hard years learning this stuff that we just have to use it right?
You're entitled to your opinion of course, strange COBOL analogy notwithstanding, but if you look at the rise of cloud environments more widely you will see that there is a shift happening towards simpler storage models (BigTables, Azure Tables etc.) because they scale more easily and don't require DB Ninjutsus to get the best out of them.
I'm sure there will still be a place for you Old-Skool data guys but that place will be within the cloud, maintaining the platform, not developing software.
And I for one will be glad. :)
Nice troll, I give it an 8.
Post #970762
RobertYoung
RobertYoung
Posted Tuesday, August 17, 2010 5:01 PM
Valued Member
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:14 AM
Points: 59,
Visits: 182
Phil Factor (8/2/2010)
Relational databases aren't supposed to be "simple" minded;
The overwhelming cost of a database application usually turns out to be the cost of training, the cost of integrating the data with the rest of the enterprise, and the cost of maintaining the system.
(This thread did a Lazarus today, so I'll contribute again.) That's the latest craze, Enterprise Master Data Management. Pays real good, too; from what I hear.
Post #970806
gavwat
gavwat
Posted Tuesday, August 17, 2010 7:19 PM
Forum Newbie
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:36 PM
Points: 4,
Visits: 41
The SQL Server Modeling technologies, presently in CTP, aim to provide significant productivity gains across the lifecycle of .NET applications by enabling developers, architects, and IT professionals to work together more effectively
The complete set of documentation for the SQL Server Modeling CTP including overviews, tutorials, and technical references for each component technology.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc709420.aspx
Post #970825
Phil Factor
Phil Factor
Posted Wednesday, August 18, 2010 1:44 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, May 19, 2013 4:00 AM
Points: 533,
Visits: 2,285
The SQL Server Modeling technologies, presently in CTP, aim to provide significant productivity gains across the lifecycle of .NET applications by enabling developers, architects, and IT professionals to work together more effectively
The complete set of documentation for the SQL Server Modeling CTP including overviews, tutorials, and technical references for each component technology.
I'd have a good look at the following article before getting too excited by the CTP.
Another piece of Microsoft's Oslo modeling puzzle disappears (Mary Joe Foley)
However, it is worth downloading it just to see what happened to poor Oslo. (warning: it expects a local installation of SQLExpress before it will work. It bombs out with an obscure error)
It is interesting to read this
Microsoft's Distributed Destination: Oslo
and this
The Origins of Microsoft's Oslo Software Modeling Platform
Brad Lovering was quoted as saying at the time..
If you’re [a Microsoft] Access user, it will be more familiar to you, let me put it that way.
So, if you kind of think of Access, [Microsoft] Excel, ...” that is an approximation of the tool,
you have to be a little bit careful with that comparison because it could be misleading. I’m trying to give you sort of a general feeling of the center; it is not [Access and Excel], but those are the best approximations I have if you haven’t experienced the tool.
The tool enables users to capture domain knowledge in domain-specific views, And the tool also will be useful for more advanced diagramming, such as enabling the development of BPMN (business process modeling notification) workflows and UML (Unified Modeling Language) services.
Hmmm... Sort of a bit like Eclipse then?
Best wishes,
Phil Factor
Simple Talk
Post #970959
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
17 posts, Page 2 of 2
««
1
2
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.