Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
SQL Server 2008
»
SQL Server 2008 Administration
»
What is the "ideal" hardware configuration...
20 posts, Page 2 of 2
««
1
2
What is the "ideal" hardware configuration for SQL Server 2008
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
Lynn Pettis
Lynn Pettis
Posted Monday, May 03, 2010 11:18 AM
SSC-Insane
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 8:07 AM
Points: 21,604,
Visits: 27,434
Actually, for a database server that needs to host 150+ databases, I'd be looking at a minimum of 64GB to 128GB ram, more would be better.
IIRC, our network services group purchased a 16TB iSCSI san for storing backup files (database, file server, email, etc) and dedup software as well instead of a dedicated hardware appliance for around 32K, maybe a bit more.
Lynn Pettis
For better assistance in answering your questions, click here
For tips to get better help with Performance Problems, click here
For Running Totals and its variations, click here
or
when working with partitioned tables
For more about Tally Tables, click here
For more about Cross Tabs and Pivots, click here
and
here
Managing Transaction Logs
SQL Musings from the Desert
Fountain Valley SQL
(My Mirror Blog)
Post #914833
Roy Ernest
Roy Ernest
Posted Monday, May 03, 2010 12:17 PM
Hall of Fame
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:52 AM
Points: 3,280,
Visits: 6,622
Here is a link that might be of interest for you. Since you have around 200K budget, you could take a look at it. It is a
TPC Benchmark
.
-Roy
Post #914864
bdavey
bdavey
Posted Monday, May 03, 2010 12:27 PM
SSC Rookie
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 10:03 AM
Points: 44,
Visits: 236
Roy,
Thank you! Very cool site.
Post #914870
Roy Ernest
Roy Ernest
Posted Monday, May 03, 2010 12:38 PM
Hall of Fame
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:52 AM
Points: 3,280,
Visits: 6,622
I hope it will help you. I actually got it today morning from a friend of mine. If we had this site, it would have been easy for us when we set up our server. We had to do it the hard way (Experimenting with different HW set ups for IO) before we found one similar to what they had stated.
-Roy
Post #914879
Greg Edwards-268690
Greg Edwards-268690
Posted Tuesday, May 04, 2010 6:13 AM
Right there with Babe
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:22 AM
Points: 788,
Visits: 5,189
bdavey (5/3/2010)
Ok Lynn, how about this:
If you had $200K to spend on hardware, including storage, for an SQL server setup what would it be?
I would look at one of the Fast Track Data Warehouse setups Microsoft is promoting.
Hardware and SAN are matched for optimal data movement.
[url=http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/fasttrack.aspx][/url]
Greg E
Post #915230
bdavey
bdavey
Posted Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:28 AM
SSC Rookie
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 10:03 AM
Points: 44,
Visits: 236
Thanks Greg. It great to find these predesigned solutions.
One question though. Is the "Fast Track" optimized for only data warehouses? We do have a lot of OLTP too.
Post #915464
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:36 AM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:14 PM
Points: 31,421,
Visits: 13,734
Fast Track is only for data warehouses. OLTP loads vary so widely.
It's still hard to guess your load. Maybe Lynn is closed on memory, but 1GB a day/150 databases, isn't a lot. That's like 7MB a day/db, correct? Not a lot of writes.
Depending on the batches, transactions, etc., you could have lots of variation on what you need. I'd also consider DR here, since I'm assuming having 150 dbs crash would be bad. I might even lean towards a 3 or 4 node cluster if you can do that, or even 3-4 servers (2 primary, 1-2 backup) with mirroring.
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #915471
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
Posted Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:49 AM
SSCoach
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:07 PM
Points: 18,733,
Visits: 12,332
With the considerations for DR, one must also include considerations for Business Continuity.
200K may seem like a lot of money but it can disappear in a heartbeat with the purchase of a SAN (depending on size), Backup Solution, DR Solution, and Business Continuity Solution. Ideally, you would want something that would not need replaced after five years.
Jason
AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server 2008
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw
Posting Data Etiquette - Jeff Moden
Hidden RBAR - Jeff Moden
VLFs and the Tran Log - Kimberly Tripp
Post #915537
Greg Edwards-268690
Greg Edwards-268690
Posted Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:59 AM
Right there with Babe
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:22 AM
Points: 788,
Visits: 5,189
bdavey (5/4/2010)
Thanks Greg. It great to find these predesigned solutions.
One question though. Is the "Fast Track" optimized for only data warehouses? We do have a lot of OLTP too.
Steve is correct - these are designed for huge data loads / query activity.
But you may want to ask Microsoft more directly on specifics.
We deal with a data warehouse, so it looks like something we will get to.
But it does nothing for our AS load.
Greg E
Post #915553
Keith Hays
Keith Hays
Posted Saturday, December 17, 2011 7:56 AM
SSC Rookie
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, May 17, 2013 9:47 AM
Points: 30,
Visits: 197
bdavey (5/3/2010)
Thanks Lynn, Greg, & Steve. I think I see the error of may ways now. Let me define this a little more.
It is a single cluster environment (1 active, 1 passive).
It is about 90% OLTP (10% warehouse).
It has 2 instances with 150+ databases.
The total space consumed, excluding backups, is about 500 Gig.
Space is expected to grow at about a 500 Mb/day.
We expect to replace our hardware every 5 years.
Rack mount is definitely prefered.
Not concerned with SLA's at this point.
Backup replication & storage does not need to be considered in this purchase.
The majority of the growth occurs during normal U.S. business hours.
$200k is the very maximum. I would probably scale down from this.
Your are concerned with SLA or you wouldn't have a cluster.
2 Dell R910 with 256GB of RAM each (go with the lowest number of procs) add more later if needed
3 years of SAN space(reassess expected growth over time) depending on your infrastructure this could blow your budget or not be a factor.
Run raid 10 for all.
1TB of for the data lun
250GB for the Log lun
10 GB for SQL system (with MSDB moved to data and log luns)
20 GB for SQL TempDB
1GB for MSDTC LUN
1 Idera SQL Diagnostic Manager license
Post #1223474
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
20 posts, Page 2 of 2
««
1
2
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.