|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 16, 2013 4:02 AM
Points: 3,131,
Visits: 1,056
|
|
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Encryption
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:25 PM
Points: 1,422,
Visits: 254
|
|
Check out this links... http://msmvps.com/blogs/gladchenko/archive/2005/04/06/41083.aspx http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/saveyourpassword/1420/
this undocumented function is available since SQLServer 7
so... what you think?
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 3:44 AM
Points: 2,173,
Visits: 1,350
|
|
| In SQL Server 2005, column-level (sometimes called cell-level) encryption became available. Now, encryption could occur within the database, but it was not easy to use, offered poor performance, and it required a re-architecture of the application, along with changes to the database schema. Even with these downsides, column-level encryption offered some advantages: such as granular security; data is encrypted in memory and disk; and explicit key management, which allows different users to protect their own data using their own keys, even preventing the DBA from seeing a user’s data. Even so, the disadvantages were so great that only the most sensitive columns of a table were generally encrypted, which meant that much of the data in a database was still left unencrypted
|
|
|
|
|
SSCommitted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:18 AM
Points: 1,996,
Visits: 1,864
|
|
Ric Sierra (3/22/2010) Check out this links... http://msmvps.com/blogs/gladchenko/archive/2005/04/06/41083.aspx http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Security/saveyourpassword/1420/
this undocumented function is available since SQLServer 7
so... what you think? Thank you! I love undocumented. I learned something new!
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 13, 2013 8:50 PM
Points: 3,208,
Visits: 4,178
|
|
Ric Sierra (3/22/2010) this undocumented function is available since SQLServer 7 PWDENCRYPT is a hash function, which means it's a one-way function. Once hashed, data cannot be restored. With cell-level encryption, data can be both encrypted and decrypted.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 13, 2013 8:50 PM
Points: 3,208,
Visits: 4,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:58 AM
Points: 174,
Visits: 555
|
|
| If SQL 2008 was part of the choices, my guess would have been wrong as I decided to choose the newest of the three.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:35 AM
Points: 594,
Visits: 654
|
|
Open Minded (3/23/2010) If SQL 2008 was part of the choices, my guess would have been wrong as I decided to choose the newest of the three.
Yeah, same...
Peter Trast Microsoft Certified ...(insert many literal strings here) Microsoft Design Architect with Alexander Open Systems
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 11:48 AM
Points: 2,602,
Visits: 1,553
|
|
| Not to be too picky but if cell level encryption was available since SQLServer 7 wouldn't SQLServer 7 have been the correct answer? Even if it was undocumented and poorly performing, it was still technically available, correct?
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, February 04, 2011 7:20 AM
Points: 977,
Visits: 1,499
|
|
Me too.
Tom Garth Vertical Solutions
"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves." -- Will Rogers
|
|
|
|