Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
Article Discussions
»
Article Discussions by Author
»
Discuss content posted by Prakriti Agrawal
»
SSRS timeout
25 posts, Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
»
»»
SSRS timeout
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
agrawal.prakriti
agrawal.prakriti
Posted Saturday, February 13, 2010 3:15 PM
SSC-Enthusiastic
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:31 PM
Points: 132,
Visits: 101
Comments posted to this topic are about the item
SSRS timeout
Post #865176
bitbucket-25253
bitbucket-25253
Posted Sunday, February 14, 2010 11:57 AM
SSCertifiable
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:33 AM
Points: 5,103,
Visits: 20,213
From the question
under timeout (in dataset):
Sorry to say this but the page referenced in the explanation does not match the Microsoft page:
SQL Server 2008
Books Online (November 2009)
How to: Create a Dataset (Reporting Services)
at:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms160345.aspx
6. In Timeout, type the number of seconds that the report server waits for a response from the database. The default value is 0 seconds.
When the time out value is 0 seconds, the query does not time out.
The above page does not correspond to the authors statement that 30 seconds is the default value......hmmmm
Now:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms160345(SQL.90).aspx
SQL Server 2005
Books Online (November 2008)
How to: Create a Dataset (Report Designer)
Updated: 14 April 2006
It Says:
6. In Timeout, type the number of seconds that the report server waits for a response from the database.
The default value is 30 seconds. Timeout must contain a value greater than zero or be left empty.
If it is empty, the query does not time out
.
Here we go again another big arguement/discussion on the quality of the QOD ....
OH WELL
If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.
Ron
Please help us, help you -before posting a question please
read
Before posting a performance problem please
read
Post #865299
Iggy-SQL
Iggy-SQL
Posted Sunday, February 14, 2010 2:24 PM
SSCrazy
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, May 19, 2013 7:02 PM
Points: 2,861,
Visits: 405
Sorry, your explanation and answer is only valid for SQL 2000. SQL 2008 requires the time out value to be 0 for the query not to time out. Whilst I appreciate you taking time to create the QotD, next time please specify the SQL version to avoid confusion. Furthermore, I never knew SQL 2000 reporting is also referred to as SSRS, as far as I know (but I know I have limited knowledge), the term SSRS started in SQL 2005 onwards.
Reference for SQL 2008: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms160345.aspx
Urbis
, an urban transformation company
Post #865312
bitbucket-25253
bitbucket-25253
Posted Sunday, February 14, 2010 3:03 PM
SSCertifiable
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:33 AM
Points: 5,103,
Visits: 20,213
Iggy-SQL
Check out this link:
SQL Server 2005 Books Online (November 2008)
Reporting Services Enhancements
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms170438(SQL.90).aspx
This may clear up some of the confusion then again it may not
If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.
Ron
Please help us, help you -before posting a question please
read
Before posting a performance problem please
read
Post #865317
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
Posted Sunday, February 14, 2010 3:41 PM
SSCoach
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 10:25 AM
Points: 18,754,
Visits: 12,337
d'oh
I missed this question due to going with documentation stating that 0 is the value that should be set.
Most people have missed it so far - and that is kind of interesting. The reason for that happening seems to be differences found in documentation.
hmmm....
Jason
AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server 2008
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw
Posting Data Etiquette - Jeff Moden
Hidden RBAR - Jeff Moden
VLFs and the Tran Log - Kimberly Tripp
Post #865320
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell
Posted Sunday, February 14, 2010 11:33 PM
Hall of Fame
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:31 AM
Points: 3,129,
Visits: 4,312
I must regrettably add to the confusion...
this is, once again, a version issue.
in 2000, the tool was only called Reporting Service
SSRS 2005 requires the timeout to be left blank,
SSRS 2008 requires the timeout to be 0,
Please include which version is being referred to in the QotD.
____________________________________________
Space, the final frontier? not any more...
All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
“libera tute vulgaris ex”
Post #865373
Kelsey Thornton
Kelsey Thornton
Posted Monday, February 15, 2010 1:25 AM
Mr or Mrs. 500
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 04, 2013 4:10 AM
Points: 532,
Visits: 281
Until I read the posts here I was going to write "Good Question".
I had to search around a bit until I found the answer.
Looking at the MS web page
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms160345(SQL.90).aspx
(to which I navigated after doing a search on MSDN), I found the "correct" answer.
I think I'll still say "Good Question" anyway
Kelsey Thornton
MBCS CITP
Post #865404
Andeavour
Andeavour
Posted Monday, February 15, 2010 1:44 AM
SSC Eights!
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:59 AM
Points: 981,
Visits: 823
Should have read the question better. The defining clue was in "(in dataset)".
Once you start looking into controling the timeouts in the Dataset, then you find the answer quoted in the documentation.
Another lesson in reading the question more carefully :)
Post #865407
ohack
ohack
Posted Monday, February 15, 2010 3:30 AM
SSC Veteran
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:15 AM
Points: 278,
Visits: 394
A somewhat ambiguous question again - as in even knowing the answer still left 2 answers as valid. If you leave the timeout box empty and click ok (SSRS 2008) it will have a zero in it when you reopen it - or you can just put a zero in there. Needless to say I was unlucky and got it "wrong".
Post #865433
Aeterna
Aeterna
Posted Monday, February 15, 2010 3:36 AM
SSC Veteran
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 5:51 PM
Points: 214,
Visits: 403
I have to agree with those who have asked for the version of SQL Server to be specifed in future. SQL 2008 clearly states a value of 0 as the "never time out" value; SQL 2000 and 2005 state a value of blank or greater than 0.
It's surely not a surprise that the majority of those who answered this question assuming that the unstated version meant the question referred to the latest version of SQL Server?
Post #865436
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
25 posts, Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
»
»»
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.