Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On

Add to briefcase 123»»»

The Sports Salary Expand / Collapse
Posted Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:48 PM



Group: Administrators
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:48 AM
Points: 34,254, Visits: 18,436
Comments posted to this topic are about the item The Sports Salary

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #725572
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 2:34 AM
Old Hand

Old HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld Hand

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, October 9, 2016 12:08 AM
Points: 379, Visits: 2,541
There always is some sort of taboo on this subject as it shows a lot of our inner workings we do not necessarily like to make so visible to others. This makes it a very private matter for most people I encountered in my career.

Personally I feel mad if I find out that someone earns significant more as I do while in day to day work I need to hold their hands to make things go right. It is an imbalance that signifies injustice to me and coming from my employer in the same way people get mad about bankers getting big bonuses for doing so great wasting taxpayers’ money and being irresponsible. I simply would not feel being taken serious and feel taken advantage of instead and quit my job over night, which is yet another reason the subject is taboo for many.

Now am I only in it for the money? Clearly not, as otherwise I would not take it as personal at all and just focus on negotiating better and earning more instead of doing my work as best I can. Performing better often doesn’t lead to better income for you, while the reverse is often true under many circumstances. In fact I value free time to do what I want to, more as just making as much money as possible.

Let the postings begin ;)

Post #725661
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 3:49 AM


Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:11 AM
Points: 171, Visits: 444
I'd love to see this happen!

BUT, for it to be worth anything, you'd need quite a bit of information about what each person actually does for their money. I can't imagine many businesses being too pleased about you making public, some/most of the things which you do as part of your job. :-\
Post #725686
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 4:20 AM



Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, November 16, 2015 1:00 AM
Points: 174, Visits: 1,800
As a BI developer with a handful of DBA responsibilities too and having been paid well under the market rate for the last 4 years I would love this! Though I know several people, particularly in my last organisation who would be less comfortable.

The largest problem is probably scalability. My wife works for the ambulance service, and here in the UK they have a similar pay banding system where you move up through a band and the band is based on your skills and responsibilities, but there are problems with ranking dissimilar roles, eg HR and Paramedics (for those that are interested HR fairs much better then paramedics).

I'm not sure if there is an ideal solution to this problem, but openness must be better than keeping everything secret. After all, MPs over here are finding out what a pitchfork looks like from the sharp end after a lot of financial secrecy!!

Assumption is the mother of all F***ups
Post #725696
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 6:31 AM



Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 28, 2016 4:00 PM
Points: 2,009, Visits: 796
To me, salary is not everything in our line of work, so making that piece of information public would not provide much benefit. I value what I get to work on, how I get treated, the hours I work, etc. more than salary. Comparing my salary to that of someone in another department within my company, or to someone who does a job similar to mine at another company, would reveal almost nothing. Looking at salary alone would lead to confusion, and the intangibles are almost impossible to quantify.
Post #725742
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 6:59 AM
Right there with Babe

Right there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with Babe

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 10:42 AM
Points: 784, Visits: 1,103
It sounds to me like the Fog Creek system has been working well for years, and I wish all companies had such a system in place. I well remember working on the payroll system for a prior employer and discovering that I was making significantly less than a junior employee who was always looking for help (still learning how to do the job). They had less experience, same level of education, and an attitude of doing "just enough".

Oh, did I mention I'm female, and they were a male? Keeping salaries "hidden" allows all kinds of discrimination to go on. And if you find out about it and challenge it, you can (and will) be fired for bringing it up to anyone - including HR - because you aren't supposed to know another person's salary, and if you do you must have gotten it by nefarious means and be a very baaaaad person.

In my state, you can be fired "without cause" at any time, and your employer does not have to provide any information to anyone as to why you were fired. So regardless of whether contract language about not disclosing salary is legal or not, you'll still be looking for work.

I believe open and honest really is better than black-boxing this sort of information. Most people would understand and appreciate a system that allows equal pay for equal work, especially when the criteria are posted for everyone to see. And salary is not MY only consideration when job-hunting, or even job-staying. Environment matters; how you're treated, the attitude of your co-workers, whether you have access to hardware and software adequate to do you job, and whether your employer values you enough to invest in occasional training. I agree with Joel's statement that if I work for a miserable boss, I'll want more compensation. And there are some behaviors that aren't worth putting up with for ANY amount of money. IMHO

Here there be dragons...,

Steph Brown
Post #725759
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 7:03 AM



Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, August 29, 2016 1:09 PM
Points: 13,999, Visits: 9,728
I like open and with published, pre-set standards for how to get a raise and all that. Takes the uncertainty out of it.

Property of The Thread

"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
Post #725766
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 7:07 AM


Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:29 AM
Points: 104, Visits: 721
I've recently gained first-hand experience of this as I just found out a co-worker, who does the same work I do, is getting paid 30% more than me. Salary information is public here when it's above a certain level, and imagine my surprise when I had to look higher and higher up the pay scale to find my co-worker. They're getting paid more than managers and they don't manage anybody! It really sucks too because I voluntarily share information I come across, techniques I use, and I'm just helping them look better in my boss' eyes while it slows me down from getting my work done.

I've thought about asking for equivalent pay but small comments from my boss make me think it's probably best to move on. I'm not really in the job for money but I just think it's way unfair what I'm getting paid now. I can imagine the people who advocate keeping salary information private are the ones who benefit the most from the secrecy, and vice versa the ones who feel slighted want it public the most.
Post #725770
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 7:20 AM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:54 PM
Points: 48, Visits: 176
I think that the whole reason that there is such tabboo in discussing salaries is to keep pay rates different between employees. I believe that it is more of a benefit to employers to not have employee's salaries be made public than it is to employees. I have heard stories (not in IT) where someone worked for a company for several years and was one of their best employees only to find out later that new hires were being hired on at a higher pay grade then what she was receiving. She quit almost immediately after she found that out. It seems the point is to get each worker at the lowest cost and keep them happy about it and productive by saying it is against policy to discuss salaries.

Also, by making this information publicly available, it allows you to know which firms do not pay as much for the same positions and allow you to focus on interviews that have a higher potential rate of return. After all, why hold salary information to be the last thing discussed? If the salary isn't right, let me know up front ahead of time and we can both save ourselves a bunch of time. In fact, I won't even waste their time even applying and avoid wasting good ink on a resume.
Post #725779
Posted Friday, May 29, 2009 7:35 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, April 30, 2015 11:27 AM
Points: 2, Visits: 25
One of the traps we fall into is when developers compare themselves and their technical value to the company. In most cases, this is the true driver of value. However, those that pays the bills, aren't so much in a position to evaluate technical value. They are there to determine business value. So, when a developer sees that he is hand-holding another developer who gets paid more, they might have to ask themselves if they are bringing business value to the table. Maybe the other individual does a stellar job in other not so technical aspects. Business value has to take into consideration other valuable skillsets such as interpersonal communications, submitting oral or written presentations, etc. I've seen may developers simply code from the design instead of speaking up when they see an obvious design flaw. Those that speak up gets management's attention and will perceive that individual as truly caring about the project. Now, we've all seen instances where that individual might be punished for speaking out, but that is usually because of the way the developer delivered the message. "Bring solutions not problems", is the manager's mantra.

I believe comparing developers to athletes is an interesting exercise. But, I would be curious to see how developers would compete in an open system. I know that if we had such a system in our company, that developers would spend more time focusing on what makes a particular manager happy. That might not be the best focus on the project.
Post #725796
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase 123»»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse