Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase 12»»

What Does Support Look Like? Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Sunday, March 8, 2009 8:14 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 12:11 PM
Points: 31,018, Visits: 15,455
Comments posted to this topic are about the item What Does Support Look Like?






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #671104
Posted Sunday, March 8, 2009 6:35 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:47 PM
Points: 35,215, Visits: 31,667
I don't mind so long as MS stops deprecating stuff... that's a bloody killer.

--Jeff Moden
"RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "Row-By-Agonizing-Row".

First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."

(play on words) "Just because you CAN do something in T-SQL, doesn't mean you SHOULDN'T." --22 Aug 2013

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to post performance problems
Post #671210
Posted Monday, March 9, 2009 10:03 AM
Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, August 10, 2012 6:08 PM
Points: 1,156, Visits: 801
I feel that this cycle came about largely due to the release cycles of the open-source world. It is a bit fast, but open-source has little to lose if they botch a release, as has been shown with several products. If Microsoft botches a release, they get hurt in big way$.

I also agree that and deprecations will need to stretch further to continue to keep the customers happy. Usually a deprecation is for good cause; but still, I think they'd want to grow the customer base and tread carefully.

Microsoft will also need to take care that faster release cycles don't introduce more issues, such as has been seen in some of the open source products.
Post #671693
Posted Monday, March 9, 2009 11:53 AM
SSCommitted

SSCommittedSSCommittedSSCommittedSSCommittedSSCommittedSSCommittedSSCommittedSSCommitted

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, September 18, 2014 6:41 PM
Points: 1,733, Visits: 1,071
I'd like to know, for how many people, does this actually matter? I would think that if you are still running SQL Server 2000, chances are you don't have any problems with it, therefore, you probably won't have any problems with it in the future, and therefore, you don't need support any ways.

I had a network administrator that basically refused to run any application from any company that didn't offer support. And when that support expired, we'd have to upgrade the product. Even though we didn't have any problems with the product and didn't plan on using any new features.

If you ask me, it was a total waste of money. Chances are, if the product works for you and then you do something that ends up breaking the product, when you call support they are just going to tell you to stop doing what you're trying to do. So what have you really gained?



Post #671814
Posted Monday, March 9, 2009 12:27 PM
Hall of Fame

Hall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of Fame

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 11:26 PM
Points: 3,214, Visits: 2,336
This situation is kind of odd ... let me explain briefly ...

In a business, the business processes and requirements that said drive the use of technology, including SQL Server, within that business. This accelerated version cycle at first sounds great but soon turns into the case of 'the tail wagging the dog'.

We have over 100 SQL 2000 instances that will eventually be upgraded to either SQL 2005 or maybe SQL 2010/SQL 2011. But remember, SQL 2000 SP4 is slated to be supported until 2013 ! If it ain't broke it ain't gonna get 'fixed'. There is no real ROI, just a black hole of expense for no reason other than to have 'our tail wag us' and probably many others as well. Just look at the adoption rates.

MS is doing good work and has in the past. However they just might want to rethink 'the tail wagging the dog' when it comes to releases.




Regards
Rudy Komacsar
Senior Database Administrator

"Ave Caesar! - Morituri te salutamus."
Post #671857
Posted Monday, March 9, 2009 12:34 PM


SSChampion

SSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampion

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:43 PM
Points: 13,872, Visits: 9,596
I'm currently supporting 2000 and 2005. We're working on getting rid of the 2000, but there are no current plans for 2008. None of the new features are critical to this business, though compressed backups would be nice (not critical, just nice).

- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread

"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
Post #671868
Posted Monday, March 9, 2009 4:22 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 12:11 PM
Points: 31,018, Visits: 15,455
Good points on the tail wagging the dog, and I'd forgotten service packs can extend out support. I'm not sure you'll get a GDR for your SQL Server 2000 SP4 box now, but I'd be curious to know if anyone has gotten anything for SQL 2000 since last April WITHOUT paying for support.






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #672033
Posted Monday, March 9, 2009 4:28 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 12:11 PM
Points: 31,018, Visits: 15,455
Gus,

Don't forget plenty of third party products, like SQL Backup, can give you compression, at a substantial savings over upgrading.







Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #672038
Posted Monday, March 9, 2009 5:02 PM
Hall of Fame

Hall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of Fame

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 11:26 PM
Points: 3,214, Visits: 2,336
Steve, MS is keeping up on security patches - our latest to apply is MS09-004 - it contains both a GDR patch and a QFE patch - prior to thet we had MS08-052 and MS08-040 - again GDRs and QFEs in each.



Regards
Rudy Komacsar
Senior Database Administrator

"Ave Caesar! - Morituri te salutamus."
Post #672053
Posted Monday, March 9, 2009 5:53 PM
SSC Veteran

SSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC Veteran

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:21 AM
Points: 266, Visits: 889
SQL Server 2000 is fine for stuff written in the days of SQL Server 2000.

The basic point here is 'if it broke don't fix it'. If it is broken (or will be) then upgrade.

If you need new features upgrade and use them.

If you have a system that has run without fail for nearly ten years you atre probably OK as you are.


.
Post #672067
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase 12»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse