Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
SQLServerCentral.com
»
Editorials
»
Too Much Data
16 posts, Page 1 of 2
1
2
»»
Too Much Data
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:52 PM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 4:22 PM
Points: 30,079,
Visits: 12,279
Comments posted to this topic are about the item
Too Much Data
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #659987
Andy Leonard
Andy Leonard
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:41 AM
Old Hand
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:12 PM
Points: 341,
Visits: 835
Hi Steve,
Great editorial and valid points. BI could help here, imo. But you're right: it's expensive and time-consuming (which is saying the same thing twice) - at least for now.
:{> Andy
PS - I love to see "Business Intelligence" in quotes!
Andy Leonard
SQLPeople Person
Follow me on Twitter:
@AndyLeonard
Post #660243
GSquared
GSquared
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:07 AM
SSChampion
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:49 PM
Points: 14,133,
Visits: 8,525
I think it actually goes one step further than that in some of these cases.
Gathering vast amounts of information is usually justified with "it's more efficient". It's more efficient to have a camera on every street-corner than a cop, and so on.
The problem with this is, the single most "efficient" means of government is totalitarianism. Call it socialism, call it monarchy or fascism, call it whatever you like, the only real way to get efficiency out of government is to make it centrally controlled and to grant it singular authority.
Inefficiency and ignorance in government is actually a necessity for freedom. There has to be a ballancing act to maintain the minimum necessary to carry out the minimum government needed to keep a free society running. Anything beyond that, in terms of efficiency and data, is just a move towards "more efficient government", meaning, of course, "more authoritarian government".
- GSquared, RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
Post #660270
jay-h
jay-h
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:15 AM
SSChasing Mays
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:35 PM
Points: 624,
Visits: 1,451
GSquared (2/19/2009)
I...Inefficiency and ignorance in government is actually a necessity for freedom. There has to be a ballancing act to maintain the minimum necessary to carry out the minimum government needed to keep a free society running. Anything beyond that, in terms of efficiency and data, is just a move towards "more efficient government", meaning, of course, "more authoritarian government".
Agreed. Privacy is essentially inefficiency in other people's knowledge about you. It's not just a nice thing, the need for privacy is deeply embedded in our psychology
To move onto more mundane areas, information is often confused with data, but information is what's left when excess data is intelligently pruned away (as when an image from carbon paper* only produces information when most of the pigments are not transferred onto the paper)
[*for you youngsters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_paper]
...
-- FORTRAN manual for Xerox Computers --
Post #660277
OCTom
OCTom
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:20 AM
SSCommitted
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:35 AM
Points: 1,676,
Visits: 2,319
Data without context is useless. Software helps to put data into context but humans have to study the data to make sense from it.
Danger comes from acting on data without understanding the context. It's dangerous to freedom when a government does it.
Post #660287
jcrawf02
jcrawf02
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:22 AM
SSCrazy
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:50 PM
Points: 2,419,
Visits: 18,230
I had two thoughts here, neither constructive.
1. Semantic Web
2. Eagle Eye
---------------------------------------------------------
How best to post your question
How to post performance problems
Tally Table:What it is and how it replaces a loop
"stewsterl 80804 (10/16/2009)I guess when you stop and try to understand the solution provided you not only learn, but save yourself some headaches when you need to make any slight changes."
Post #660289
Ron Kunce
Ron Kunce
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:55 AM
SSC-Addicted
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, April 27, 2012 2:55 PM
Points: 452,
Visits: 404
To take the reverse opinion. Camera's that are not monitored serve not only as a deterent, but the video is there should an incident occur where the identification of a suspect is needed. You can hardly watch any cops and and robbers show on TV where some post incident review of video helps to catch the bad guys.
In the DBA world, how often do you review the log files? The common answer is almost never, unless an incident occurs that requires finding a cause for some problem. Hmmm...sounds like we are just as guilty collecting needless intelligence until it suddenly becomes needed. Maybe some BI software would be great to extract only needed database log entries in a meaningful way and discard the junk. But, using what basis and before or only after an incident?
Ron K.
"
Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.
" -- Martin Fowler
Post #660345
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 8:37 AM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 4:22 PM
Points: 30,079,
Visits: 12,279
I do think there's value for the cameras being there, even if they're not watched, or even hooked up. There's a bit of a deterrent, and as you mentioned, you can review them later. they're like logs, which you don't review often, but you keep around.
However there can be valuable things in logs if you could proactively monitor them. Some type of BI might alert you to issues before they become problems. The same for lots of other data if you spend the time building something to review the data.
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #660431
DPhillips-731960
DPhillips-731960
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:22 AM
Ten Centuries
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 05, 2012 8:49 AM
Points: 1,094,
Visits: 791
Steve Jones - Editor
...and I think businesses need to make sure they are not only making the investments, but continuing to fund them as they evolve.
This I agree with heartily. Projects are never perfect, and a "living" company needs a "living" project that can be flexed.
Post #660614
GSquared
GSquared
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:29 PM
SSChampion
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:49 PM
Points: 14,133,
Visits: 8,525
Steve Jones - Editor (2/19/2009)
I do think there's value for the cameras being there, even if they're not watched, or even hooked up. There's a bit of a deterrent, and as you mentioned, you can review them later. they're like logs, which you don't review often, but you keep around.
However there can be valuable things in logs if you could proactively monitor them. Some type of BI might alert you to issues before they become problems. The same for lots of other data if you spend the time building something to review the data.
The problem with the cameras not being hooked up is that the news on that will get around, and then they'll be ignored, and no more deterent value, even for the ones that are hooked up. Good old "boy who cried wolf" syndrome.
- GSquared, RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
Post #660925
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
16 posts, Page 1 of 2
1
2
»»
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2012 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.