Secure Cell Phones

SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.

Popular Topics

Home

Members

Calendar

Who's On

Home » SQLServerCentral.com » Editorials » Secure Cell Phones

21 posts, Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 »»»

Secure Cell Phones

Rate Topic

Display Mode

Topic Options

Author

Message

Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Posted Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:52 AM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 11:20 AM
Points: 31,437, Visits: 13,752

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Secure Cell Phones

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help

Post #640129

GSquared

Posted Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:04 PM

SSCoach

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:55 PM
Points: 15,442, Visits: 9,571

I guess I don't get why it would be insecure for the president to have a Blackberry or other smartphone. Don't put military or other sensitive information on it. Don't set up "the button" as an e-mail in your address book. And so on, but why would it be "more secure" to have people instead of a device?

After all, humans have at least 10,000 years of security issues, and DNA isn't exactly "open source". There isn't even a disclosure policy for when new weaknesses are discovered! Kidding aside, people are more likely to garble data, and so on, than a device is. And people are at least as likely to steal/misuse data.

- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread

"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon

Post #640135

Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Posted Tuesday, January 20, 2009 7:15 PM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 11:20 AM
Points: 31,437, Visits: 13,752

I'm not sure what the problem is myself. There's a GPS, but we know where the President is most of the time. Not like he travels alone.

There is the possibility someone would hack into it and send messages out, but nobody with Obama's Blackberry number or email should be accepting "official" communications with it.

Hopefully this isn't a US (Microsoft) v Canadian (RIM) thing.

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help

Post #640333

Nicole Bowman

Posted Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:18 PM

SSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:47 PM
Points: 171, Visits: 1,402

Broke 4!?! I am still using my old Palm Pilot m130 and Nokia 8210 from years ago. I really need to upgrade!

Perhaps "they" would like to better control the information President Obama gets. After all you can't have a president that is in touch with (gasp) "the general public".

Good luck to you all in the USA. Your new president looks like a good'un.

Cheers.

Nicole Bowman

Nothing is forever.

Post #640399

Tobar

Posted Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:10 AM

SSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:33 AM
Points: 172, Visits: 556

[people multitasking] I think it is disgusting to have a person I am physically present with carrying on a remote conversation with someone or thing while I am talking to them. For that matter people carrying on 2 conversations of any kind in my mind shows a lack of respect for either party.

[Obama and Blackberry] Every thought that the President records in any form is public record. Therefore all his "private" electronic conversations would by necessity be available to the public at some point. I believe the argument is that "for his own protection" he should not use a Blackberry. You know that there are legions of people foreign and domestic that would love nothing better then to embarrass the President. This is all aside from the security issues with the devices themselves. Let us not kid ourselves that our President is going to correspond with "Joe or Josephine" commoner, to get his information. His advisors will still only be people he trusts, whether he gets his information face to face or otherwise. I think it is great that there is this "spirit" of openness. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking it is more open than it really is however.

[General Note] Regardless of how you voted, we [in the US and others I suppose] should cheer that we have once again transferred power without military force or violence. Despite the fact that we think it is normal, the world clearly indicates otherwise.

<><
Livin' down on the cube farm. Left, left, then a right.

Post #640576

salman.samad

Posted Wednesday, January 21, 2009 6:51 AM

SSC-Addicted

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:41 AM
Points: 461, Visits: 229

I'd have to agree with Tobar with regards to people carrying out remote conversations while being engaged with someone else - it is very rude indeed!

Coming back to secure cell phones, I think the actual question should be: what is it that is in on your cell phones that one would want them to be secure? If it's a personal cell phone, I could care less if someone steals my themes or ring tones. If it's a work device, one has to use proper judgement when storing sensitive material on the phone itself. But then again, that would be applicable to not just cell phones but any mobile device for that matter.

Post #640663

Derek Dongray

Posted Wednesday, January 21, 2009 7:33 AM

Ten Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 13, 2013 2:04 AM
Points: 1,342, Visits: 1,946

Steve Jones - Editor (1/20/2009)

I've love to have a secure cell phone, something that couldn't be scanned or eavesdropped on, but at $3,000+ a copy, I'm not sure I'd get one of these anytime soon. Especially given the fact I broke 4 last year.

Having watched the video about the Sectera Edge, I think you'd really have to treat it badly to break one of these devices!

Survive 4ft drop onto concrete 26 times...water jet for 40 minutes...operating in 140F to -9F...vibration tested...dust resistant!

Of course, you could probably just take a hammer to it! :D

Derek

Post #640717

Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Posted Wednesday, January 21, 2009 7:50 AM

SSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 11:20 AM
Points: 31,437, Visits: 13,752

or a horse?

I came to the conclusion the Dash was very poorly built. A 6" drop broke one. I've seen iPhones survive multiple falls from 3ft+, so I have my eye on one of them.

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help

Post #640733

Steve S.-542474

Posted Wednesday, January 21, 2009 7:53 AM

SSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:32 AM
Points: 109, Visits: 70

FWIW: There are several brands of encryption "sleds" that can be added to the Blackberry. They add a little less than half an inch to the depth of the device; not perfect but better than free text.

Post #640737

salman.samad

Posted Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:27 AM

SSC-Addicted

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:41 AM
Points: 461, Visits: 229

[b]I've seen iPhones survive multiple falls from 3ft+, so I have my eye on one of them.

Believe it or not Steve, I had the iPhone and I think I hold the record for returning it within 10 days!! Reasons:

1. There was a noticeable lag between application loads - once it took me a good 4-5 seconds to finally get to the screen to dial home! It also had to do partially with the fact that the phone just wouldn't register my screen touches at times.
2. No tactile feeling - I couldn't dial 911 if I had to without looking at the damn screen!
3. Lack of privacy - you could see the pin I dialed for my VM from a few feet away!
4. The fear of rendering it useless if it ever fell keeping in mind that I am the kinda guy who drops his cell phone every now and then.

PS. I am now quite happy and content with my Sony Ericcson W380a :)

Post #640788

« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

21 posts, Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 »»»

Permissions