Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase

upgrade to 2005 or 2008? Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Saturday, January 3, 2009 3:00 PM
SSCertifiable

SSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiable

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 4:23 AM
Points: 5,886, Visits: 13,047
Question: whether to upgrade SQL 2000 to 2005 or go straight to 2008?

About a year or so ago Steve was advocating making the jump direct to 2008, http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administration/3094/ whilst around the same time MS were leaning towards going to 2005 first, then 2008. I was wondering, now that 2008 is out, what would you do?

To come clean, I ask because it is a decision I have to make, and I am interested in the opinion of the forum. My environment is about 90% SQL2000, 10% 2005, spread across 70 odd servers and about a 1000 databases. The main complicating factor is the use of consolidated servers supporting multiple apps.

Its early days yet and I realise an in-depth analysis will need to be done on compatibility issues with the numerous applications but the thought of being able to go straight to 2008 and then not worry about an upgrade for 5 years or more is quite tempting. Off the top of my head a possibility is leave the existing 2005 servers where they are and just upgrade the 2000 servers to 2008, to spread the load and risk a bit.

Your thoughts, intentions?


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Post #629357
Posted Sunday, January 4, 2009 3:36 AM


SSC-Forever

SSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-Forever

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 8:31 AM
Points: 40,456, Visits: 36,912
george sibbald (1/3/2009)
Off the top of my head a possibility is leave the existing 2005 servers where they are and just upgrade the 2000 servers to 2008, to spread the load and risk a bit.


That's what I'd do in your place. Then when the next major version's released, you can upgrade the 2005 servers to that.



Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass

Post #629434
Posted Wednesday, January 7, 2009 8:15 AM
SSCertifiable

SSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiable

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 4:23 AM
Points: 5,886, Visits: 13,047
thanks for the input Gail.

I feel the need to 'bump' this thread as maybe it was missed having being raised at the weekend.

Anyone out there using SQL 2008 and want to share their views on it. Note I will be using standard edition so the big new features (e.g. compression) won't be available to me.

cheers

george


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Post #631500
Posted Thursday, January 8, 2009 2:09 AM


SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 11:02 AM
Points: 2,397, Visits: 3,419
I would try to install 2008 on all server, so that development-, test- and production-environments have same platform.



N 56°04'39.16"
E 12°55'05.25"
Post #632182
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase

Permissions Expand / Collapse