|
|
|
Grasshopper
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, July 24, 2009 12:57 AM
Points: 21,
Visits: 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:24 AM
Points: 892,
Visits: 936
|
|
Good question. Unfortunately SQL Server 2005 SP2 does not ignore database snapshots when selecting the "all databases" option in the backup task in a maintenance plan. Seems to be a bit of an oversight on MS part and pain in ours. Maybe this will be fixed in SP3. Hopefully at least one of the many third-party backup vendors figured out you cannot backup snapshots.
David
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Journeyman
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:28 PM
Points: 89,
Visits: 288
|
|
The no backup solution was obvious but I do not understand why you cannot take another snapshop, to cancel all changes.
Clement
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:46 PM
Points: 193,
Visits: 327
|
|
I agree. I know you can't backup snapshots, but then why wouldn't you take another snapshot so that it is fresher than an older snapshot with a fuller sparse file?
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Veteran
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, August 15, 2011 12:53 PM
Points: 243,
Visits: 236
|
|
Me too - why not take another snapshot?
Randy
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:46 PM
Points: 193,
Visits: 327
|
|
Yes, this is another wonderful trick question that we'll have to deal with in everyday life as a DBA. Perhaps, in some countries, where there are 100 million Oracle DBAs and 120 million SQL DBAs, then people have to trick each other to see who really knows his/her stuff, as everyone is a DBA looking for a job and employers have to ask really tough questions.
How many more questions are we going to see like this? It helps no one.
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Journeyman
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:28 PM
Points: 89,
Visits: 288
|
|
I agree. Be more practical on the questions.
Clement
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, June 04, 2010 11:18 AM
Points: 547,
Visits: 66
|
|
The premise of the question seemed to be “how to reduce the size of the snapshot?” and the answer is – Take another snapshot. I agree this is a crappy question…If a DBA came up to this scenario and was asked to reduce the size of the snapshop file by doing a backup and he replied “you can’t backup a Snapshot” and walked away, I would fire them. I would expect the DBA to say “I’ll take care of it” and do another snapshot to reduce the size.
Brian RL: Be serious about your work, but do not take yourself too seriously {Philip A. Fisher}
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 13, 2013 7:49 AM
Points: 1,409,
Visits: 2,032
|
|
I would argue that a snapshot is a form of backup. I realize it can't be used if the source database is physically gone, but you can revert from it if you accidentally change/delete data.
If you really are running in to disk space issues because of a snapshot being too large, the best (and only) think you can do is drop and recreate that snapshot. Taking no backup won't solve anything.
Jason Shadonix MCTS, SQL 2005
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:29 PM
Points: 2,057,
Visits: 215
|
|
Although the question mentions that the snapshot will grow quickly, there is no mention of trying to shrink the size of the snapshot or running out of disk space. It asks what kind of backup is best for a snapshot database.
You might think that this kind of 'trick question' doesn't help anyone, but I would hope that it would help the 79% (at the time of this comment) of the people who got this question wrong.
|
|
|
|