Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase

How to support development machines? Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:39 AM
SSC Journeyman

SSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC Journeyman

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, July 24, 2009 2:52 PM
Points: 95, Visits: 457
We have several Sql Server development machines. I am not sure of the exact count since each area (dev, QA, support) has their own set of machines; but I would say less than 20 total. The developers can create databases at will. They create our product database so that they can do their UI testing/development. The databases are created; the dbs don't have a lot of data; and they are rarely dropped until there are space issues.

Currently, the only task I perform is to monitor space issues on the machines using xp_fixeddrives. There is no need to backup or restore any dbs.

My question is -- is there anything else I could be doing to monitor the machines? I would like to be more proactive but I am not sure what else I should be doing.

Thanks!
Post #576056
Posted Thursday, September 25, 2008 11:08 AM


Right there with Babe

Right there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with Babe

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 1:56 PM
Points: 769, Visits: 1,167
RedGate SQL Response
some monitoring tool


or there are couple articles in SQL Central on collecting info from multiple DB servers as a job etc...


Unless they happen frequently, I would say reactive to DEV machines is good enough
You can act on it when it actually happens, to clean out some space for example


SQLServerNewbie

MCITP: Database Administrator SQL Server 2005
Post #576249
Posted Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:16 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 3:19 PM
Points: 31,526, Visits: 13,863
I would run backups. Sooner or later a developer will break something and want to get the schema from yesterday.







Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #576485
Posted Friday, September 26, 2008 8:27 AM


SSChampion

SSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampionSSChampion

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:49 AM
Points: 13,436, Visits: 25,281
You might want to get the developers to put their database structures into source control. That way a given development database can be rebuilt from scratch. Further, as they start doing releases to production, etc., you can apply labels so that you know what the database looked like at a moment in time should the need arise to undo a change in production.

----------------------------------------------------
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." Theodore Roosevelt
The Scary DBA
Author of: SQL Server 2012 Query Performance Tuning
SQL Server 2008 Query Performance Tuning Distilled
and
SQL Server Execution Plans

Product Evangelist for Red Gate Software
Post #576910
Posted Friday, September 26, 2008 11:27 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 3:19 PM
Points: 31,526, Visits: 13,863
I think source control is good, but if you have a lot of developers, it can be rather cumbercome and confusing. What I'd do is once they think they have something set, meaning they'll use this schema for now, add that object to VCS and move it to a central schema. Having their own db or their own schema means developers can play and then when they're ready to move forward, in essence roll out to the shared development area, then you start tracking it.






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #577043
Posted Friday, September 26, 2008 11:45 AM
SSC Journeyman

SSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC Journeyman

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, July 24, 2009 2:52 PM
Points: 95, Visits: 457
The funny thing is they are not really doing database development work. They just need the database so that the front end will work. So, they don't need the databases to be backed up or version controlled. We have so many versions of our product and everyone wants to connect to their own db so that they can muck around with the data via the UI anyway they want (which makes sense). So, we have lots of dbs just lying around.

I was just wondering if there was anything I could do maintenance-wise to prevent future issues (and to learn something new).

Thanks for the replies.
Post #577056
Posted Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:22 AM


SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, June 07, 2013 2:50 PM
Points: 2,435, Visits: 434
it sounds like the environment itself forces you to be in a reactive mode, so there may not be much else for you to do in terms of being proactive.

you may want to configure some default settings, such as location of database data and log files, to make certain that when databases are created they are being placed correctly. on top of that, you may also want to configure model to have the correct recovery mode, etc., so that new databases cause a few issues as possible.

do they have sysadmin rights, or just database creator rights? if they are sysadmin, then they will be able to undo all your efforts anyway, which puts you back to being reactive.


----------------------
http://thomaslarock.com
Post #579676
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase

Permissions Expand / Collapse