|
|
|
SSC Rookie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:21 AM
Points: 36,
Visits: 124
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDP Broadcaster
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:15 PM
Points: 1,443,
Visits: 711
|
|
| useful info! thanks for the article!
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 10:18 AM
Points: 551,
Visits: 1,153
|
|
Thanks for the article.
I have question about the Effective Max %. Assume we have no workload in PoolA, PoolB, and PoolC. Can the Default pool get 100% reources or will it be limited to an Effective Max of 25% regardless? In otherwords, can the behavior be as follows. Give the Default pool 100% resources until a workload comes along from PoolA, PoolB, and/or PoolC and then reduce the Default's resources.
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Rookie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:21 AM
Points: 36,
Visits: 124
|
|
| It would only limit the resource when there is competition to acquire resources.
|
|
|
|
|
Right there with Babe
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 1:56 PM
Points: 769,
Visits: 1,167
|
|
Thanks for the thread, I almost finished reading it Then I tried to enable my Resource Governor and I got an exception, which explains it Now I don't have to finish reading the article :P as we won't see Enterprise edition anytime soon
The resource governor is not available in this edition of SQL Server. You can manipulate resource governor metadata but you will not be able to apply resource governor configuration. Only Enterprise edition of SQL Server supports resource
See the end of this message for details on invoking just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.
************** Exception Text ************** Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.FailedOperationException: Alter failed for ResourceGovernor 'Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ObjectKeyBase'. ---> Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Common.ExecutionFailureException: An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: 'ALTER RESOURCE GOVERNOR RECONFIGURE' failed. The resource governor is not available in this edition of SQL Server. You can manipulate resource governor metadata but you will not be able to apply resource governor configuration. Only Enterprise edition of SQL Server supports resource governor. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Bo
SQLServerNewbie
MCITP: Database Administrator SQL Server 2005
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 4:02 PM
Points: 171,
Visits: 1,411
|
|
Very well written article! Clear, concise and easy to understand. Thank you.
Nicole Bowman
Nothing is forever.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, June 15, 2013 2:08 PM
Points: 525,
Visits: 624
|
|
Thank you for the article. This is a long overdue great new feature. One instance I can immediately think of where it would be useful is when users need access to query production server. Bad practice? I know! But we all live in a real world. Throttling down their queries using resource governor approach described in the article would be a great safeguard to have!
|
|
|
|
|
SSCarpal Tunnel
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 5:01 AM
Points: 4,815,
Visits: 1,343
|
|
Nice article with good info....
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Journeyman
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:01 AM
Points: 79,
Visits: 1,207
|
|
I found the article little wordy (nice article though), wish you could add some pictures (may be visio diagrams) explaining some of the things described, which would have made the reading little more easier.
paul
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:26 AM
Points: 891,
Visits: 1,958
|
|
| When you create your classifier code, can you assign pools according to database? We're looking at copying our ERP database to a different server for reporting purposes and, since "Joe/Jane User" can report from this, I'm anticipating some really lousy queries written against it. Limiting their ability to eat the server could be a very desirable thing.
|
|
|
|