Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase 12»»

Regarding using VARCHAR(MAX) Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:39 PM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, January 17, 2011 2:24 AM
Points: 4, Visits: 16
Hi All,

I would like to know whether the usage of VARCHAR(MAX) intead of using VARCHAR(fixedlength) affects the performance.

Thanks in Advance!!!

with regards,

S.N.Surendrababu
Post #551587
Posted Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:17 PM


SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:02 AM
Points: 2,365, Visits: 1,825
Varchar(fixedlength) has maximum capacity of 8000. i.e you can define varchar(8000). If you want to store more than this in a varchar column you need to use varchar(max). The maximum capacity of varchar(max) is 2gb.
Use varchar(max) only when its required.


check this out for more details -
http://www.sqlserverandxml.com/2008/01/varcharnvarchar-n-vs-max.html


"Keep Trying"
Post #551599
Posted Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:23 PM
SSC-Addicted

SSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-Addicted

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 9:54 AM
Points: 470, Visits: 588
one drawback is that varchar(max) can't form part of a index key.

also it's simply wasteful and inefficient.

when you write a program in C, you don't allocate 2gb of memory to hold a 10 character string do you?


---------------------------------------
elsasoft.org
Post #551600
Posted Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:35 PM


SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:02 AM
Points: 2,365, Visits: 1,825
True varchar(max) cannot be a part of a index. But it has its uses. Its much easier to store and manipulate large strings compared to sql server 2000.

"Keep Trying"
Post #551604
Posted Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:00 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, January 17, 2011 2:24 AM
Points: 4, Visits: 16
Hi,

I use VARCHAR(MAX) for parameters (Not for fields), These parameters are used in the Where clause of the Query.

for example.


CREATE PROCEDURE [Sample]
(
@deliverycenter varchar(500)
)

as

declare
select * from itemdetails i where i.deliverycentercd in (@deliverycenter)
.....

Here instead of using varchar(500) can I use VARCHAR(Max), does it affects the performance.


Post #551612
Posted Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:29 AM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, May 10, 2009 10:10 AM
Points: 33, Visits: 30
Hi there,

If you are sure that the length of the parameter @deliverycenter will be less than 8000 characters then use varchar(500). Whilst varchar(MAX) will not affect the performance much, since they are stored in the database memory space rather than a pointer to data concept as in Sql Server 2000 (TEXT/NTEXT/ IMAGE datatypes). So the process time with varchar(MAX) is proportional to the size of the data you are processing . (Will not be of much difference).
So the answer to your question is "The performance will not be affected much".



declare
select * from itemdetails i where i.deliverycentercd in (@deliverycenter)

I don't understand why you using the above syntax, instead you can use a direct comparison to compare two strings.(here you are trying to perform a case sensitive compare between @deliverycenter and i.deliverycentercd).
Post #551771
Posted Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:06 AM


SSCertifiable

SSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiable

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 2:13 PM
Points: 6,866, Visits: 8,071
Rowsize > 8060 bytes ?
-table size is still limited by fixed-length types, as well as internal headers and row pointers.
-You cannot create a table with a row size of greater than 8060 bytes if that table is comprised of e.g. all numeric columns.
row overflow:
-If a row exceed 8060 bytes, the data for varying columns (VARCHAR, NVARCHAR, or VARBINARY) will be automatically moved off-row into the large object area.
In addition, each column that is moved off-row will occupy a 24-byte on-row pointer. Make sure when creating large tables that the pointers will not cause rows to overflow the 8060-byte limit, or data modifications may be terminated as a result of too much data in row.

If you have off-row columns, you may end up with vast IO overhead.
(One to read the pointer, the second to read the off-row column)


Johan

     Jul 13  

Don't drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
but keeping both feet on the ground won't get you anywhere

- How to post Performance Problems
- How to post data/code to get the best help


- How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt ?


"press F1 for solution", "press shift+F1 for urgent solution"


Need a bit of Powershell? How about this

Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me
Post #551796
Posted Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:34 AM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, May 10, 2009 10:10 AM
Points: 33, Visits: 30
Ya you are right, that above for 8000 bytes we need a off row data, we should also turn on the option "large value types out of row". But i wonder what is the big difference between the TEXT and VARCHAR(max) apart from the fact that VARCHAR(MAX) can be used as local variables whereas TEXT cannot be so.
Post #551817
Posted Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:49 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 4:08 PM
Points: 38,099, Visits: 30,392
TEXT is an older datatype, is deprecated in SQL 2005 and will be removed in a future version. Many of the string functions (left, right, substring, replace, etc) don't work on Text, while the do on varchar(max)


Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass

Post #551834
Posted Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:53 AM


SSCertifiable

SSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiable

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 2:13 PM
Points: 6,866, Visits: 8,071

The huge advantage of varchar(max) compared to Text is you no longer need to use the special functions to manipulate text-columns, you can use them as variables, parameters, ...


Johan

     Jul 13  

Don't drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
but keeping both feet on the ground won't get you anywhere

- How to post Performance Problems
- How to post data/code to get the best help


- How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt ?


"press F1 for solution", "press shift+F1 for urgent solution"


Need a bit of Powershell? How about this

Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me
Post #551839
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase 12»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse