Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase «««34567

Cursor optimization Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Wednesday, July 9, 2008 8:14 AM


SSCertifiable

SSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiable

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:45 AM
Points: 5,916, Visits: 8,169
davidthegray (7/9/2008)
Ok, Hugo, I followed your suggestion.

If anybody think this feature would be useful, you can vote here: http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=355519


Thanks, David. You have my vote.

(BTW, did you remember to vote on it yourself?)



Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP
Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
Post #530849
Posted Wednesday, July 9, 2008 8:45 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 5:53 PM
Points: 33,063, Visits: 15,179
OK, points awarded back.

The question has also been changed to specify the cursor fitting in memory. Apologies for the delay. We had hay delivered yesterday (160 bales) and it started to rain, so work got interrupted so I could run move it into the barn.

The wish to add folders to SSMS is on the list somewhere at MS. I talked with them specifically about this and it's something the manageability team has been thinking about in future tools.

The QOtD now has a schedule system and an admin system, but I'm not sure if there's a way to get a group that can see them in advance. I'll ask the question.







Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #530882
Posted Wednesday, July 9, 2008 9:02 AM


SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, April 19, 2010 6:47 AM
Points: 100, Visits: 130
Hugo Kornelis (7/9/2008)
davidthegray (7/9/2008)
Ok, Hugo, I followed your suggestion.

If anybody think this feature would be useful, you can vote here: http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=355519


Thanks, David. You have my vote.

(BTW, did you remember to vote on it yourself?)


No, I didn't find it so honest to vote for myself. Anyway, I have already got the anser from MS:

Hi David, Thank you for your request to add folders. This has been a long standing request in the past - http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=245943. We are considering ways to better organize information in a future release of SQL Server. I'm resolving this as a duplicate. Thank you

Actually I did a scan for the word "folders" before posting my suggestion. Something wrong with the MS search engine?
Following the link you can find another post (#209340) for the same suggestion, with lot of duplicate reference. Not surprisingly, I'm not the only one longing for that feature!
Post #530910
Posted Friday, July 11, 2008 8:27 AM


Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 19, 2014 6:51 AM
Points: 1,264, Visits: 723
The question has a note about fitting cursor in memory. This is what BOL says about FAST _FORWARD cursors:
"The most dramatic improvement is seen when processing cursors with relatively small result sets that can be cached in the memory of an application. The fast forward-only cursor with autofetch enabled represents the most efficient method of getting a result set into an ODBC application..."

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187502.aspx

May be I overlooked something.
Post #532497
Posted Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:47 PM


SSCertifiable

SSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiable

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:45 AM
Points: 5,916, Visits: 8,169
SveG (7/11/2008)
May be I overlooked something.


Hi SveG,

I think you did.

That particular quote refers to "the fast forward-only cursor with autofetch enabled", which is a specific kind of client-side cursor (that uses similar optimizations techniques that the server-side T-SQL fast-forward cursor uses as well).



Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP
Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
Post #533183
Posted Thursday, April 21, 2011 6:01 AM
Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:28 AM
Points: 1,100, Visits: 4,898
So the correct answer is "it depends"
Post #1096913
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase «««34567

Permissions Expand / Collapse