Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
SQLServerCentral.com
»
Editorials
»
The December Energy Update
19 posts, Page 1 of 2
1
2
»»
The December Energy Update
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Friday, December 21, 2007 7:08 PM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 5:09 AM
Points: 31,526,
Visits: 13,864
Comments posted to this topic are about the item
The December Energy Update
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #435932
Jeff Moden
Jeff Moden
Posted Friday, December 21, 2007 9:23 PM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:01 PM
Points: 33,111,
Visits: 27,037
Now, that's quite an article... some great references, too! Thanks for the research, Steve.
--Jeff Moden
"
RBAR
is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "
R
ow-
B
y-
A
gonizing-
R
ow".
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."
For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
For better answers on performance questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
Post #435947
jay-h
jay-h
Posted Wednesday, December 26, 2007 8:53 AM
Say Hey Kid
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, June 14, 2013 10:50 AM
Points: 691,
Visits: 1,724
Compressed air as a power source probably predates most electric applications. There is a themal heat loss, however which tends to make it much less efficient than electricity.
...
-- FORTRAN manual for Xerox Computers --
Post #436360
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:55 PM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 5:09 AM
Points: 31,526,
Visits: 13,864
Hadn't thought about that, but it would be nice if you could use that thermal energy somehow. Maybe incorporate into some heating/cooling application?
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #436474
Charles Kincaid
Charles Kincaid
Posted Wednesday, December 26, 2007 3:42 PM
Right there with Babe
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 11:56 AM
Points: 772,
Visits: 1,828
I like the personal nuclear reactor.
Sure, let's hook that bad boy up in my backyard. I could use it to boil my stew and sell the excess power.
ATB
Charles Kincaid
Post #436508
Jeff Moden
Jeff Moden
Posted Wednesday, December 26, 2007 4:10 PM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:01 PM
Points: 33,111,
Visits: 27,037
Heh... use the heat of compression to make hot water, the thermal losses of expansion to provide refrigeration, and the left over pressure to drive a low pressure turbine.
--Jeff Moden
"
RBAR
is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "
R
ow-
B
y-
A
gonizing-
R
ow".
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."
For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
For better answers on performance questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
Post #436511
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Wednesday, December 26, 2007 9:22 PM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 5:09 AM
Points: 31,526,
Visits: 13,864
I was thinking that the compression could aid the solar hot water in providing radiant heat. The cold air could be used for cooling in the summer.
I still agree the portable nuclear reactor is cool. I think it would be neat to have one, but more than likely this would be a great small town investment. Provide power fairly locally instead of using such large centralized plants.
I'm donating land if they give me free power :)
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #436537
Jeff Moden
Jeff Moden
Posted Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:37 AM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:01 PM
Points: 33,111,
Visits: 27,037
What would really be "cool" is Low Temperature Differential Stirling Engines. Design one that would work at 70-90
o
F
d
Diiferential (would be kinda large but light-weight) that would kick out 3,000 watts certain and continuous... would run on hot water from solar. Neat thing is, it would also run at night when air temps were a bit lower and would work very well in the winter when you'd only need to get the water to 100-120
o
to achieve the temperature differential. In the summer, it would have plenty of reserve power to not only turn a generator, but it could drive a second Stirling Motor backwards to make some cold air for air conditioning. Waste heat from that would make more hot water.
--Jeff Moden
"
RBAR
is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "
R
ow-
B
y-
A
gonizing-
R
ow".
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."
For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
For better answers on performance questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
Post #436605
DEK46656
DEK46656
Posted Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:25 AM
Old Hand
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:00 AM
Points: 314,
Visits: 372
Nice editorial. A couple of "opinions";
micro-nuclear is great, and even though it could be used in some locations, I want to see that used in spacecraft. Imagine what could be done if there were 100's of Kilowatts to 10's of Megawatts on a satellite orbiting the outer planets. On the "space industry" side of things, to support the idea of "mining" the moon for Helium 3 (an expensive nuclear fusion fuel), a small reliable power plant on the surface is needed. On the propulsion front, it could be used for an ION drive, an NTP (Nuclear Thermal Propulsion) drive, or one of the many hybrid concepts that have been proposed. Something along these lines is probably needed to make a manned Mars trip / exploration viable.
The CO2 capture is IMHO missing the point, any capture that is done should be turned back into fuel. Carbon is the "low tech" approach to create a storage system for Hydrogen. The technology is available now, and can easily be deployed. The one that I lean towards is making Methanol; there is an industrial process that can work on a large scale, and the alcohol can be used directly in an IC engine, or fed into a fuel cell. Methanol does have some negatives with it, so I don't see it as a cure all, but it could definately be deployed in a closed system.
Beer's Law: Absolutum obsoletum
"if it works it's out-of-date"
Post #436724
Jeff Moden
Jeff Moden
Posted Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:54 AM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:01 PM
Points: 33,111,
Visits: 27,037
My problem with a mega-watt satilite would be that some idiot would figure out a way to turn it into a beam weapon. ION drive? Way cool application for the mini-nuke.
So far as Ethanol goes, it's nothing more than an only slightly less harmful substitute in my eyes... it's still going to give off CO
2
(the major green house gas) and another green house gas that comes in second right after CO
2
... water vapor. Not sure what the byproducts of combustion are for Methanol, but I believe its going to be a little more nasty. It's also tough on plastics and rubber so car manufacturers would have a serious change. In fact, right now, most owners manuals state that if you use either Methanol or Isopropyl alchohols in the vehicle, the warranty will be rendered null.
Big question would be when are we going to stop Oxydizing carbon based materials as heat source? If the mini-nuke can be made safe enough to put in my back yard, why not put an electrical outlet on it to charge up the car? Sure, since it's mostly free electricity, you could also crack some ionized water (NAOH as an ionizer in a semi-closed system, for example) to make some H2, but then there's that green house gas known as H
2
O vapor again. We've gotta find some way stop burning stuff...
Handful of tera-watt parachute generators in the Gulf Stream would do it with virtually no environment impact... no fish choppers (turbines), no ugly windmills, and it's basically solar/planetary-rotation driven. Would make the combination of Hoover Dam and Niagra falls look like a triple-A battery in comparison. Or dig a couple of "Project MOHO's" (drill past the Earth's crust to get some real heat from the Mantel, done on the ocean floor where the crust is thin) and we'd have all the electricity we'd need.
Of course, the boys selling oil, natural gas, and corn-squeezin's would squawk... :P
--Jeff Moden
"
RBAR
is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "
R
ow-
B
y-
A
gonizing-
R
ow".
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."
For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
For better answers on performance questions, click on the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
Post #436744
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
19 posts, Page 1 of 2
1
2
»»
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.