|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 5:07 AM
Points: 2,732,
Visits: 23,078
|
|
Dealing with this as a deployment issue would probably be the best approach. Create a process or an application that will apply changes across all of the databases. Once approach to this may be to create a single database with just your stored procedures in it and a process that replicates all of the procedures to your other databases when a ddl event fires. This could be managed pretty easily through triggers or even SQL replication and would ensure nothing ended up out of sync.
Regardless of how you do this, I would try to establish this type of infrastructure right away and make sure everyone sticks to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, November 27, 2009 8:11 AM
Points: 5,
Visits: 14
|
|
Thanks for your input, it's much appreciated! :)
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Addicted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, January 07, 2013 11:28 PM
Points: 433,
Visits: 618
|
|
"You are not likely to run into errors from adding procedures to the master database"... umm, maybe/maybe not. Master is a system database and effectively belongs to MS - yes you can put your own stuff in there at the risk of (1) breaking something or (2) having a service pack or hotfix break something for you...
|
|
|
|