|
|
|
Grasshopper
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 6:03 PM
Points: 10,
Visits: 33
|
|
Hi, Lawrence. Thanks for the advice but this is exactly what I don't want to do. I'd like to see if in one step I can load the info and validate the number of rows transferred in order to move to a new step (depending in the number of rows). Best regards,
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 13, 2013 12:24 PM
Points: 908,
Visits: 1,671
|
|
I agree with you that it is not intuitive when you have a workflow property on a step. This happened to me on a DTS package I was given to maintain and was a real pain to find out what was going on. My solution once I found it was to just put an annotation note next to the step regarding the workflow property. After that experience, I said to myself that I would probably not use them in the future. But, after reading this article I may have to rethink that position. A simple note about a workflow property would let you know to look into the step for the code. Nice simple article.
|
|
|
|
|
Grasshopper
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, November 23, 2009 1:40 AM
Points: 13,
Visits: 18
|
|
Great - just what I was looking for however I found that the If statement had to all be keyed as a single line for it to work. Strange really as the MS SQL HELP also formatted the IF as per the example here..... Now all I need to be find, is how to enquire on a table using ActiveX...
Trainee Novice
|
|
|
|