|
|
|
SSC Veteran
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 26, 2012 7:17 PM
Points: 239,
Visits: 68
|
|
255 is usually a significant number in this industry of ours. I wonder where that fits into the issue you just mentioned.
Regards,
Steve
Life without beer is no life at all
All beer is good, some beers are just better than others
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:15 AM
Points: 55,
Visits: 188
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Dedicated
           
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:30 PM
Points: 32,893,
Visits: 26,770
|
|
Actually, just had cause to revisit this particular thread...
... and it just dawned on me that tests in the article are not measuring the performance of each method... the tests are measuring how well each method runs a loop which has nothing to do with transferring data to a file. If you want a real test, build a table with desired number of rows (100k for example) and then simply select from that table using each method. The results will be drastically different.
Here's how to build a 100k row table of numbers in an eye-blink...
SELECT TOP 100000 IDENTITY(INT,1,1) AS N INTO dbo.Numbers FROM Master.dbo.SysColumns sc1, Master.dbo.SysColumns sc2 And, yeah... where is the test for BCP?
--Jeff Moden "RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "Row-By-Agonizing-Row".
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."
For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
For better answers on performance questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
|
|
|
|