Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase 12345»»»

Inconsistency Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:22 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 4:31 PM
Points: 32,780, Visits: 14,941
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Inconsistency






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1431343
Posted Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 PM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, March 17, 2013 10:06 PM
Points: 28, Visits: 86
That I just need more time to "get" the Win8 modern user interface. I now realise that the idea of passive touch was needed (and still believe that part), but not with a side scroller interface. The side effect of losing the dept hierarchy of data is the saddest part of all and a pain to search through.

Passive touch needs a kiosk or fixed screen area (eg. iOS android especially on small screens. On large monitors the top and bottom is wasted) with only paging and zoom in and out. Active touch (electrostatic that you feel which I like to call touchy-feely) works in both dimensions just like the mouse.

Passive touch = fat finger problems which is why I understand the design decisions, like not having a horizontal scroll bar, as then people would ask for a vertical one.
Active touch = pixel perfect interactive UI where you can feel the UI and potentially the data.

Active touch allows you to feel the close button without having to press it. Feel the window edge to know when you can resize it, etc.
Post #1431361
Posted Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:52 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 4:46 PM
Points: 35,959, Visits: 30,250
I've made my living through both consistency and change. I've been an advocate of and have made my living by doing many things in T-SQL that some folks may have never considered. I do things outside the proverbial box such as avoiding SSRS to do simple things like turn my automated morning server reports into HTML formatted wonders. I fight the tide of nay-sayers by locking down my systems well enough to be able to turn on and confidently use xp_CmdShell correctly through stored procedures to download from SFTP/FTP sites and even run Powershell from T-SQL to create my daily disk space report complete with different colored warning indicators.

My consistency is the power of T-SQL and the changes I've made to do different things have been an eye opener to even me.

I commissioned a friend of mine to build a bit of artwork that explains my mantra. It has the likeness of the "Cheshire Cat" comfortably laying belly down in a litter box, his arms folded over the side and bearing an ear to ear and very toothy grin, with several mice around him pointing and laughing. The sentence near the top of the work says it all for me...

"Before you can think outside the box, you must FIRST realize... you're in a box!"


--Jeff Moden
"RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "Row-By-Agonizing-Row".

First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."

"Change is inevitable. Change for the better is not." -- 04 August 2013
(play on words) "Just because you CAN do something in T-SQL, doesn't mean you SHOULDN'T." --22 Aug 2013

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to post performance problems
Post #1431364
Posted Friday, March 15, 2013 3:06 AM
SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 11:42 AM
Points: 2,865, Visits: 1,705
I've changed my mind about the existence of superiority of one technology vs another.

If you look at the comments following a ZDNet article there is rabid hatred of Microsoft expressed on the Linux articles.

When I started in computing it was Atari 800 Vs Apple II, then Commodore Vs Sinclair and so on right through to iOS vs Android and Linux vs Windows. As if any of it matters or is relevant. It certainly isn't worth the venom and bile expended on posts.

Here is a tool to do a job. It is 1 million times better than you need to do the job. Here is another tool. Someone opines that it is 1 million times better than the one you have. Whether they are right or wrong I still have a surfeit of tool.


LinkedIn Profile
Newbie on www.simple-talk.com
Post #1431412
Posted Friday, March 15, 2013 4:52 AM


Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, January 13, 2014 4:35 AM
Points: 1,046, Visits: 2,997
I think there's a difference between something you wholeheartedly believe and a strongly held opinion. There are lots of things I wholeheartedly believe, but none with a belief that can't scrutinised critically from time to time. And if that belief doesn't stand up, it is amended or discarded as necessary. I see nothing inconsistent in that; how could I have confidence in something that can't stand up to close examination?

Semper in excretia, sumus solum profundum variat
Post #1431450
Posted Friday, March 15, 2013 6:16 AM
Grasshopper

GrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopper

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, March 27, 2014 9:49 AM
Points: 18, Visits: 100
I'm in a gradual process of transformation over enterprise virtualization- my initial belief was that people who intended VM servers to be business components in their environment were on a fool's errand for using a sandbox technology in live production. I'm still not fully convinced that MSSQL is fully portable to the virtual realm until the deltas of upper-scale performance are indistinguishable from VM to host system, but there's still time.
Post #1431493
Posted Friday, March 15, 2013 6:59 AM


Hall of Fame

Hall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of Fame

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 03, 2014 7:07 AM
Points: 3,622, Visits: 330
While it may not be exactly what is asked for in the question "What strong opinion did you hold that has been changed over time?", here's my input:

At my first assignment as a US Air Force comm officer, we developed the system that managed cargo and passenger movement for Air Mobility Command. It was written in COBOL and had an in-garrison version that ran on a Sun/UNIX environment and a "remote" version that ran in a PC/DOC environment. Our data was stored in an "advanced file management system". There was an API that we used to read/write data and behind-the-scenes the data was stored in huge text files. About a year or so before I left, our system admins wanted us to convert the system to use a relational database. The development team fought it tooth-and-nail and won - no conversion of the system was ever done.

I often think "if only I knew then what I know now...".



Post #1431513
Posted Friday, March 15, 2013 7:14 AM


SSCarpal Tunnel

SSCarpal TunnelSSCarpal TunnelSSCarpal TunnelSSCarpal TunnelSSCarpal TunnelSSCarpal TunnelSSCarpal TunnelSSCarpal TunnelSSCarpal Tunnel

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 8:20 AM
Points: 4,862, Visits: 2,243
I used to think that applying OO with rigid software engineering practices was always right but I now think that it is sometimes right.

Unfortunately not enough people make it an active choice.


Gaz

-- Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen...they're everywhere!!!
Post #1431520
Posted Friday, March 15, 2013 7:58 AM


SSC Veteran

SSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC VeteranSSC Veteran

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:28 PM
Points: 246, Visits: 181
I used to think people who had two monitors were just being ostentatious...now that I have two I want three.
I used to think Windows 7 was worse than XP...now I actually like it.
I used to think Facebook was a complete waste of time..still do. (Wish I'd have thought of it though.)
Post #1431546
Posted Friday, March 15, 2013 8:10 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, September 06, 2013 6:20 AM
Points: 4, Visits: 229
I have been in the industry since 1984 and I remember when everything we did was "roll-your-own". My first job was at Naval Intelligence in Washington, D.C. and my first project was to write graphic primitives (what we called driver's back then) for our Calcomp plotter and our HP graphics terminals (slightly smarter than an original VT-100). So, over the years, I have greatly changed my mind about roll-your-own VS pre-built libraries.

I have also gone from Oracle to Adabas to Oracle to SQL Server to Firebird/IBPhoenix and back to SQL Server with a little MySQL thrown in for good measure. I wonder sometimes if that is why I seem a little schizophrenic?

I can remember arguing that C and assembler where the best languages to use because interpreted languages could never be fast enough. Now I enjoy using javascript/jquery/et al.

And of course, I remember thinking a 56K modem was all the speed anyone would need to connect to the internet.

I guess I have learned that as Heraclitus of Ephesus (c.535 BC - 475 BC) taught that the only real constant in life is change.

Jeff
Post #1431552
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase 12345»»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse