|
|
|
SSC-Dedicated
           
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:51 PM
Points: 32,910,
Visits: 26,800
|
|
opc.three (1/10/2013)
Agreed, not about shooting the test writer but about the nonsensical options. You literally have to rule out all the real choices based on how ambiguous they are. "Compare and contrast normalization and de-normalization with respect to data modifications and the expense of data retrieval." Now that's a solid question, albeit that approach tends to fall down when writing a multiple choice exam 
Did you see the other question concerning the model database? Nah... shoot the test writers.
--Jeff Moden "RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "Row-By-Agonizing-Row".
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."
For better, quicker answers on T-SQL questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
For better answers on performance questions, click on the following... http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:57 PM
Points: 6,724,
Visits: 11,771
|
|
No, please share. Nothing like a good witch hunt on a Thursday morning.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________ There are no special teachers of virtue, because virtue is taught by the whole community. --Plato
Believe you can and you're halfway there. --Theodore Roosevelt
Everything Should Be Made as Simple as Possible, But Not Simpler --Albert Einstein
The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them. --Albert Einstein
1 apple is not exactly 1/8 of 8 apples. Because there are no absolutely identical apples. --Giordy
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:16 PM
Points: 4,
Visits: 8
|
|
| the test was for my semester 3 exams in college. These 2 questions that i posted didnt make much sense to me so I just wanted to know what others thought
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Addicted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 4:16 PM
Points: 494,
Visits: 2,151
|
|
fearghalreilly (1/9/2013) i went with answer B but not fully sure if it was the correct decision ....
Sorry to say that you went for the wrong option!
B) de-normalization speeds up data modifications at the expense of data retrieval
When you de-normalise the data you're going to re-introduce some form of data redundancy. Which means modification would be applied to more rows (as data is now duplicated).
On the other hand, data retrieval would be faster when accessing correctly indexed de-normalised data.
BTW, when I read this earlier today I went for option E but like the rest I chose E because I didn't feel comfortable with the other options.
----------------------------------- http://www.SQL4n00bs.com
|
|
|
|