|
|
|
Valued Member
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:53 PM
Points: 73,
Visits: 339
|
|
I have a stored procedure and when I run it First time it creates an execution plan and it takes long time to complete which is understandable after the first time when I run it second time, it works perfectly...
now here is the issue... If I run the proc lets say today manually then there is no issue rest of the day and application accessing it don't complain about timeout issues...
when I run the proc tomorrow it again takes forever to complete...and the applications time out on the front end...
to resolve the time out I have to manually go to SSMS run the stored proc..and then applications have no issue for the rest of the day.
my question is why is the Query execution plan getting flushed/lost next day ? the data doesnt change much and not at all some times...
SP uses Temp table and correlated subquery.
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy Eights
        
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:34 PM
Points: 8,592,
Visits: 8,233
|
|
WangcChiKaBastar (12/26/2012) I have a stored procedure and when I run it First time it creates an execution plan and it takes long time to complete which is understandable after the first time when I run it second time, it works perfectly...
now here is the issue... If I run the proc lets say today manually then there is no issue rest of the day and application accessing it don't complain about timeout issues...
when I run the proc tomorrow it again takes forever to complete...and the applications time out on the front end...
to resolve the time out I have to manually go to SSMS run the stored proc..and then applications have no issue for the rest of the day.
my question is why is the Query execution plan getting flushed/lost next day ? the data doesnt change much and not at all some times...
SP uses Temp table and correlated subquery.
That is the nature of execution plans. They can and will be removed from the cache when sql needs the room for something else. If this data is pretty constant maybe you could use a table to hold the results instead of running your proc repeatedly.
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Moden's splitter.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Dedicated
           
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:54 AM
Points: 37,692,
Visits: 29,951
|
|
It's probably got nothing whatsoever to do with the cached execution plan. The optimiser is not allowed (in most cases) to spend minutes optimising a query.
What's probably causing the slow-down is having to re-load the data required for the procedure into the data cache. I'd guess that something like index rebuilds, checkDB or large data loads are done at night, hence displacing the data cache.
The solution here is to tune the query, it's probably requiring more data than it should due to inefficient queries or poor indexing and you mainly see the effects of that when the data has to be pulled from disk.
Gail Shaw Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
We walk in the dark places no others will enter We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:41 AM
Points: 2,562,
Visits: 3,451
|
|
GilaMonster (12/26/2012) The optimiser is not allowed (in most cases) to spend minutes optimising a query. Not allowed means? what i think is optimizer will take time to generate plan regardless of time boundation.please explain
-------Bhuvnesh---------- While 1 = 1 (Learning SQL....) Click to get fast response of your post
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 13, 2013 5:41 AM
Points: 2,
Visits: 42
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Dedicated
           
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:54 AM
Points: 37,692,
Visits: 29,951
|
|
Bhuvnesh (12/27/2012) what i think is optimizer will take time to generate plan regardless of time boundation.
You would be thinking incorrectly then. Google: optimiser 'reason for early termination'
Gail Shaw Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
We walk in the dark places no others will enter We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Veteran
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:57 AM
Points: 299,
Visits: 484
|
|
WangcChiKaBastar (12/26/2012) when I run the proc tomorrow it again takes forever to complete...and the applications time out on the front end...
to resolve the time out I have to manually go to SSMS run the stored proc..and then applications have no issue for the rest of the day.
my question is why is the Query execution plan getting flushed/lost next day ? the data doesnt change much and not at all some times....
Check Sql Error log to find what cleared your plan cache.There you can see some error messages like below.
QL Server has encountered 1 occurrence(s) of cachestore flush for the 'Object Plans' cachestore (part of plan cache) due to "" Operation.
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Dedicated
           
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:54 AM
Points: 37,692,
Visits: 29,951
|
|
dbasql79 (12/27/2012) Check Sql Error log to find what cleared your plan cache.There you can see some error messages like below.
QL Server has encountered 1 occurrence(s) of cachestore flush for the 'Object Plans' cachestore (part of plan cache) due to "" Operation.
That only logs complete clearing of the cache, not if single plans are aged out or invalidated.
Gail Shaw Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
We walk in the dark places no others will enter We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:41 AM
Points: 2,562,
Visits: 3,451
|
|
GilaMonster (12/27/2012)
Bhuvnesh (12/27/2012) what i think is optimizer will take time to generate plan regardless of time boundation.You would be thinking incorrectly then. Google: optimiser 'reason for early termination' will this option also return value when first time exec plan get created ? is this option gives the value of 'reason for early termination' when query tried to use same plan for last time ? like if we get "timed out" , does that mean that query coudnt able to generate new plan and used plder one ?
-------Bhuvnesh---------- While 1 = 1 (Learning SQL....) Click to get fast response of your post
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Dedicated
           
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:54 AM
Points: 37,692,
Visits: 29,951
|
|
Bhuvnesh (12/27/2012) will this option also return value when first time exec plan get created ?
Yes
is this option gives the value of 'reason for early termination' when query tried to use same plan for last time ? like if we get "timed out" , does that mean that query coudnt able to generate new plan and used plder one ?
No. Did you do the research?
Gail Shaw Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
We walk in the dark places no others will enter We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
|
|
|
|