|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, September 13, 2012 3:14 PM
Points: 4,
Visits: 23
|
|
What are the guidelines for the the root directory path for a second sql server instance being added to the same server where a 'default' instance already exists with its root directory on the same C: drive?
What will happen if I, instead, use the E: drive for the root directory for the second instance?
|
|
|
|
|
SSCoach
         
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:25 AM
Points: 18,754,
Visits: 12,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right there with Babe
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:32 PM
Points: 796,
Visits: 2,279
|
|
It does not matter where you let the SQL executable reside.
I never, ever use Drive C for anything. Not even the OS. I install all other instances on the same drive as the Default and then place the actual data files on the drives with the default instance system databases, but into their own respective directory.
I use one spindle for the executables, one spindle for the Data Files, one Spindle for the Log Files and one spindle for the Temp Database. For any really large database, or database that has high transactions, I place that one on its own spindle as well.
Andrew SQLDBA
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, September 13, 2012 3:14 PM
Points: 4,
Visits: 23
|
|
But aren't there some 'shared' files/folders/etc. that will need to be updated (or written to) on the default instance's root directory when the second instance is installed? So what happens to these shared files/folder/etc. if that second instance is installed on another drive?
|
|
|
|