Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On

Add to briefcase «««123

SQL Server 2012 Certifications Revamped Expand / Collapse
Posted Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:50 AM

Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 2:03 PM
Points: 1,334, Visits: 3,069

Exactly right. It's like I have said before on this forum and have gotten castigated for saying it, the only people that I have noticed that are fully behind these Microsoft certifications are people who either work for Microaoft, or they have a vested interest in you studying to get them.

"Technology is a weird thing. It brings you great gifts with one hand, and it stabs you in the back with the other. ..."
Post #1304168
Posted Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8:49 AM

Old Hand

Old HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld Hand

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:30 AM
Points: 370, Visits: 283
mhaskins 96481 (5/22/2012)
TravisDBA (5/21/2012)
...the main purpose of certifications is to continue to make money...

I completely agree.
It's all about the bottom line. And the bottom line is: those exams are almost worthless unless you are using them toward the Partner program to get free licenses from Microsoft.

I don't think the answer is "to make $"

A group of friends and I got together to study for the VB5 exam (~1998) and in the beginng we all planned to take the beta test version (the reduced price one).

None of us took the real test for various reasons, but we did meet weekly for about six months and learned a lot on our own.

Why I didn't take the test - thirty percent of the grade was on using the MSFT VB installer in various ways. No one used that thing, we all bought a $200 product (one license per site) that had a WYSIWYG interface and computed DLL dependencies for you.

I did take the beta (1) on the off chance that they would throw out enough questions about the installer that I could pass and (2) just to have the experience.
Excluding the installer portion I got an admirable 85+ percent on all sections (probably 90%+ overall).

I think I showed my results and got a job based on my test results (which msft reported as a fail; but I considered a good showing).

So, why are the exams done like they are:
The exams are set up to make people study what msft wants them to study.
And it's still a free market in the USA, so they are free to do that if they want.
I will probably continue to not participate (unless my employer starts picking up the tab or offering raises based on certifications).
Post #1307829
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase «««123

Permissions Expand / Collapse