|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, February 14, 2013 6:03 AM
Points: 1,237,
Visits: 3,342
|
|
Koen Verbeeck (3/28/2012)
Good to see questions on SQL Server 2012. I did find the question itself poorly phrased, because of the use of "other" and the general term "options". When I look at the reference, I see the following: contained, uncontained, partial, non-contained So it looks like there are more two correct answers, but there is no explanation given why some are correct and others aren't. edit: after reading the reference a few times, it makes more sense 
This was my understanding of the question as well. Judging by the QOTD responses and that most people answered incorrectly (as did I) the wording threw many of us off.
|
|
|
|
|
SSCoach
         
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:07 PM
Points: 18,733,
Visits: 12,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 6:20 AM
Points: 2,038,
Visits: 930
|
|
|
|
|
|
Say Hey Kid
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 5:38 PM
Points: 677,
Visits: 375
|
|
| Got confused with the word "Other". Thought it was partial and uncontained!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 02, 2013 3:45 PM
Points: 3,748,
Visits: 928
|
|
Good question, but a little more wording on it would have helped understand what "other" means (options for creation, options for containment model, etc.)
"El" Jerry.
"El" Jerry.
"A watt of Ottawa" - Gerardo Galvan
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:57 PM
Points: 2,575,
Visits: 1,533
|
|
| I got confused with the wording too, but I too am happy to see some 2012 questions pop up.
|
|
|
|
|
SSCommitted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:20 AM
Points: 1,948,
Visits: 574
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:06 AM
Points: 150,
Visits: 70
|
|
Agree with those who say the question is a bit confusing.
If you have containment set to NONE, then it's not a contained database, surely ? Especially since all new databases are not contained by default.
Or are all databases in SQL 2012 to be considered as "contained", with the tie-breaker being the type of containment on each ? 
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Dedicated
           
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 4:46 PM
Points: 31,433,
Visits: 13,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
Say Hey Kid
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 4:28 AM
Points: 695,
Visits: 1,023
|
|
| Got partial, but got the other option wrong. Learnt something.
|
|
|
|