|
|
|
SSC Veteran
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, February 06, 2010 6:21 AM
Points: 269,
Visits: 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 7:51 PM
Points: 1,
Visits: 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, March 13, 2009 6:06 AM
Points: 139,
Visits: 2
|
|
Can you link to more than one (eg. sybase) server?
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:58 PM
Points: 1,
Visits: 1
|
|
wow, it is very useful to me.. thank you buddys.... .
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Newbie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 15, 2010 3:25 AM
Points: 4,
Visits: 24
|
|
A great article, but something worth noting is that when a query is executed against a linked server using "select stuff from linkedServer.dbName.owner.objectName" SQL Server actually returns all the rows from the table(s) in the linked server and the executes the query locally (using T-SQL syntax), whereas when you use the OpenQuery() syntax the query is passed down to the linked server and only the result set is returned, this means that OpenQuery() needs to use the native syntax of the linked server rather than t-sql (assuming it's not a SQL Server!). This was my experience at least and if I'm slightly off the mark then I'd welcome further comment. Thanks for an interesting article
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Rookie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:52 AM
Points: 25,
Visits: 68
|
|
Very good article.
Okay, so when using OPENROWSET, it is using OLE DB. How about using LINKEDSERVER itself? Is it still OLEDB based connection? or ODBC ?
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, March 19, 2010 7:45 PM
Points: 1,043,
Visits: 308
|
|
one more note: Link server does not support access on SQL Server 2005 64 bit  mom
|
|
|
|
|
Old Hand
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:38 PM
Points: 371,
Visits: 755
|
|
Very basic article. Even so it is explained in the article header, I would like to add that linked servers were available from SQL 7(or 6.5?) and did not change on introductory level since. I would also assume that in SQL 7 processinf heterogenous queries had more flexibility than in SQL 2005. I would expect from SQLservercentral publications more indpeth, detailed coverage.
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Rookie
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:01 AM
Points: 36,
Visits: 111
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSChasing Mays
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 11:52 AM
Points: 668,
Visits: 1,339
|
|
Good introduction. I expect more in-depth articles on this subject to follow. I have used this to attach, remote SQL servers, Access databases, and even text files. I have even heard of attaching DB-400 through Client Access. Somebody asked about multiples. Yes you can.
ATB
Charles Kincaid
|
|
|
|