Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase «««56789

Know Your SQL Objects Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Monday, May 16, 2011 9:13 AM
Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 11:12 PM
Points: 1,263, Visits: 1,081
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (5/16/2011)
michael.kaufmann (5/16/2011)


I'm even more confused now ...

The edited correct answer reads:
[...] Rows CAN span multiple pages.
[...] Ref: Pages and Extents - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190969.aspx Rows CANNOT span pages


BOL is wrong on that page. The overflow and lob data imply that the data that makes up a row can be on two different pages (or more). I think the BOL author copied from previous verisons, and despite later in the paragraph that it lists "this restriction may be relaxed", they have not corrected the initial sentence. It should read that non-variable length data types may not span across pages. So I can't have 9k worth of INT columns.


This wasn't exactly about BOL--but on the edited 'correct answer' that now bears a contradiction in it.
In my opinion the entire 'correct answer' should have been rewritten, and while the link to BOL might still have been included, the phrase rows cannot span pages should have been removed and your explanation included instead.

Thanks,
Michael
Post #1109453
Posted Monday, May 16, 2011 9:40 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:34 PM
Points: 31,181, Visits: 15,626
Ah, sorry. The explanation editor box is small for me and I didn't see that part of the explanation. It's been fixed.

My apologies.







Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1109504
Posted Monday, May 16, 2011 10:08 AM


SSCoach

SSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoach

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:18 PM
Points: 17,824, Visits: 15,756
excellent question. thanks



Jason AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server, MVP


SQL RNNR

Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw
Post #1109551
Posted Thursday, May 26, 2011 4:07 AM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 8:41 AM
Points: 48, Visits: 266
The below statement is confusing:
"Pages in extents may be assigned to only one object"
Does it mean:
- 1 object and no more than 1 object (false), or
- 1 object is possible (true)

Otherwise, a DBA should get the question right.
Post #1115260
Posted Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:58 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:34 PM
Points: 31,181, Visits: 15,626
"may" speaks to possibilities. Extents can be uniform (one object stored) or mixed (multiple objects stored)






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1115574
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase «««56789

Permissions Expand / Collapse