|
|
|
SSCommitted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:11 AM
Points: 1,945,
Visits: 2,782
|
|
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Stairway to Data, Step 5: Types of Scales – Part I
Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing Analytics and OLAP in SQL Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data, Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties SQL Programming Style SQL Puzzles and Answers Thinking in Sets Trees and Hierarchies in SQL
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, April 05, 2013 1:44 PM
Points: 146,
Visits: 160
|
|
Great narrative, Joe! I almost fell out of my chair laughing at the Borges commentary on the Wilkins discussion of Kuhn's attribution of the Chinese encyclopedic categorization of animals!
One question: At one point you state "The convention here is to allow gaps and say that they are both third and nobody is second." From my (anecdotal) experience, it is just the reverse (both second, nobody third) -- at least in the U.S.; perhaps that is all switched around and backward across the pond, eh? 
BTW, I noticed just a few typos: "metr4ic", "Let's we will use...", "Do not confused the two."
And I think I can rule out trans-national differences on this one because I lived for a time in Australia (which approaches Britain asymptotically)... the cute little spiny anteater was spelled "echidna" rather than "ekidna".
Kind regards, ~~Michael Sorens
|
|
|
|