﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Discuss Content Posted by Gregory Larsen / Article Discussions / Article Discussions by Author  / Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL) / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:40:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1169431-90-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]jberg-604007 (10/21/2011)[/b][hr]Especially now that Sql Server 2008 is more like Oracle 10/11 than ever, which is actually a good thing.[/quote]Since I have a primordial hatred for Oracle, I'll have to strongly disagree with that notion.  ;-)</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:21:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeff Moden</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1169431-90-1.aspx</link><description>Thank you, Greg. I enjoyed this.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:45:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jon Russell</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1169431-90-1.aspx</link><description>i may be wrong about this, but I thought Sytem/38 was an operating system for IBM minicomputers</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:00:59 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Duncan Tilley</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1169431-90-1.aspx</link><description>glad you mentioned Relational, Inc.  Otherwise one would get the impression that M$ invented everything that is in the current Sql standard.  Especially now that Sql Server 2008 is more like Oracle 10/11 than ever, which is actually a good thing.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:54:38 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>jberg-604007</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1169431-90-1.aspx</link><description>Thank you kindly for this series.Onhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stairway+Series/75772/#the link to Level 3: Relational Database Designwhich should be http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stairway+Series/75775/#is actually tohttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stairway+Series/75774/#which isLevel 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)For some reason the dates at the bottom are two weeks to the future eg today is 2011/09/07 and the date on	Stairway to T-SQL Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)is By Gregory Larsen, 2011/10/21 Martti K.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 02:43:55 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>martink-1041194</dc:creator></item><item><title>Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1169431-90-1.aspx</link><description>Comments posted to this topic are about the item [B]&lt;A HREF="/articles/SQL/75774/"&gt;Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)&lt;/A&gt;[/B]</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:03:54 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Greg Larsen</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>